The nation has always been independent from China. Not for a single day has it been ruled by China. Twenty-three million Taiwanese -- 7.7 times the number of Singaporeans -- have the absolute right to advocate continued independence from China.
The UN has the duty to protect the human rights of Taiwanese people, who outnumber the people of Singapore by 20 million. The nation's people have the right to pursue an internationally-recognized status as an independent and sovereign nation.
When Singapore's Foreign Minister George Yeo (
Yeo said that if there were any push toward independence, a war across the Taiwan Strait would be very difficult to avoid and that the stability of the Asia-Pacific region and even the world would be at stake.
Such statements only serve to further encourage aggressive powers to violate human rights with military force.
Many groups in the Canadian province of Quebec that have advocated and worked for independence did so without the Canadian government aiming 600 missiles at them.
Nor did the federal government fire test missiles over Quebec to intimidate the population, which is about the same as Singapore's. Just as the independence movement in Quebec has not sought to incite a war, the independence movement in Taiwan -- which has not for one single day been ruled by China -- has not created the current risk of war in the Taiwan Strait.
China's aggression is the primary reason a risk of war exists in the Taiwan Strait.
Not only did Yeo's speech at the UN General Assembly seriously violate the human rights of Taiwan's 23 million citizens, it also encouraged the violation of human rights by military powers.
The Taiwan Association of University Professors solemnly would like to tell our Singaporean friends that Yeo's speech -- in its tacit support for military power -- will sooner or later place them under the same tyrannical authority of those powers.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS