Last July, the US Presbyterian Church moved to boycott Israel and firms that do business with the Jewish state, ostensibly in sympathy with the Palestinian people for the harsh treatment they receive under the occupation. Now, the Anglican and Episcopalian Churches are preparing to join in the boycott as well, with a final vote to be held next June ("Anglican group promotes boycott of Israel, firms," Sept. 26, page 6).
Representatives of these two denominations have recently returned from a "fact-finding" mission to the occupied territories. They were shocked at the deplorable conditions there, and incensed at the construction of the wall separating the two peoples. They deplore the checkpoints, curfews and restrictions, without ever pointing to the causes.
These church representatives, although claiming their decision was one of "moral responsibility," are incredibly naive. They are being used as dupes by the Palestinian leadership, which has been incapable of halting acts of violence and terrorism against Israelis.
These foolish Christians, in their simplistic analysis, compare the situation in Israel to that of South Africa during the period of apartheid. They conveniently forget that the white South Africans were Christians who were supported for many years by Christian churches.
The itinerary of the representatives was a highly selective one, carefully prepared by the Palestinians. Gullible to an extent that defies logic, they accepted this view as gospel.
They never questioned the degree of Palestinian responsibility for their predicament. They never questioned the lack of democratic process among these "victims," their leadership tainted by terrorism or any other relevant factors. They were so ready and willing to blame the Jews.
Did these good Christians bother to visit Israeli hospitals to view the real victims of Palestinian terrorism? Sadly, the answer is "No!"
Unfortunately, the Christian churches have a long history of anti-Semitism, which led to the Inquisition (and the forcible conversion, torture or death of countless Jews) and to the hatred of Jews that culminated in the Holocaust. With such a bloodstained record, these Christian churches should be ashamed to be seen as attacking their perennial victims.
While they may have antipathy toward the "People of the Book" for never having accepted the Christian faith, they might look into the New Testament and consider the words of Jesus Christ: "Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's," and avoid political gambits which will tarnish the reputation of the churches.
Perhaps it's time these Christians reread the Bible. They seem to have forgotten that God told Abraham: "And I will make thee a great nation, and I will bless thee, and make thy name great; and thou shalt be a blessing: And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee" (Genesis 12:2-3).
It does not bother them that peaceful democratic nations like Taiwan are threatened by dictatorships like China, or that countries like Tibet have been swallowed, and their native cultures decimated. They are, however, disturbed by Jews who refuse to lie down and die.
One can only hope that good sense will prevail, and that the churches' congregations will reject the unwarranted "Christian call" to boycott the state of Israel, which will merely exacerbate the current situation and punish the victims rather than the perpetrators.
Chaim Melamed
Pingtung City
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and