In an attempt to redirect Taiwan's annual campaign to rejoin the UN, President Chen Shui-bian (
Through a video conference with the international media in New York, Chen sent out a clear message about the Taiwan government's strong will and ability to become a UN member.
For over a decade, the government has launched a series of campaigns to raise the question of a "return" to the UN under the ROC name, but these attempts received 11 straight rejections by the General Assembly. Although Taiwan's bid was again defeated this year, the Chen administration has injected new and decisive force into the nation's UN strategy.
By clarifying that Resolution 2758 of the General Assembly -- passed in October 1971 -- only deals with the People's Republic of China's (PRC) right to representation in the UN and its subsidiary organizations, Chen de-linked the PRC's UN representation with Taiwan's own pursuit for UN membership and its subsidiary organizations. As Chen pointed out, "Taiwan is Taiwan. Taiwan cannot and will not fight for the right to represent China."
Resolution 2758 recognized the PRC as the sole and legitimate government of China and thus granted the Beijing regime the seat in the General Assembly. This resolution constitutes the greatest hurdle for the Republic of China in returning to the UN.
The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government's maneuvering on Taiwan's participation in the UN is a manifestation of its recent advocacy for a clearer identification of "Taiwan" as a country. Chen's virtual meeting with UN journalists provided an opportunity for the DPP government to intensify its efforts to educate the international community that Taiwan and China are individual countries -- and that Taiwan's participation in the UN is not the problem, but rather the solution to the "one China" dispute.
Using the name "Taiwan" to apply for new membership faces the same obstacles the old government has encountered because to become a new member of the UN, Taiwan must receive the support of at least nine of the 15 members of the Security Council, including unanimous consent from its five standing members, which includes the PRC. Moreover, a new application requires approval by a two-thirds majority vote from the members of the General Assembly.
Just because these challenges seem insurmountable does not mean Taiwan should just passively wait and see what happens. Strengthening Taiwan's bid for UN membership is the ultimate goal. The key now is to counteract Beijing's international propaganda by reinforcing international understanding that Taiwan is not a part of China, and that Taiwan will not compete with Beijing on the issue of representing China in the UN.
Moreover, the straightforward adoption of the name "Taiwan" represents a growing collective will through democratic choices that the 23 million people in Taiwan want to become active and contributing members of the world community.
Therefore, as Chen emphasized, a free and democratic country like Taiwan should not be the "missing piece" in the UN's principle of universality. Taiwan's absence in the UN has left its 23 million people without an internationally acknowledged identity and has turned them into international vagabonds, victims of political apartheid.
In sum, it is evident that any attempt to knock on the UN's door under the rubric of the "Republic of China" is a dead end. The government and people of Taiwan should build on their progress in human rights and democratic consolidation and "participate" in, rather than "rejoin" the UN.
By doing so, it will pave the way for the world to distinguish a "democratic Taiwan" from both the authoritarian China represented by the PRC and the authoritarian China represented by the former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) regime.
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS