The pro-democracy camp in Hong Kong received more than half of the votes in the weekend's legislative council election, but it failed to win a majority. Despite this, voter turnout increased, and all parties advocated the direct election of the Special Administrative Region's (SAR) chief executive, showing that people's desire for democracy cannot be stopped.
Yet democracy cannot happen overnight. People of Hong Kong need to demonstrate more determination in order to challenge Beijing. The election revealed that Hong Kong's people increasingly seek democratic reforms, as seen in the turnout rate, intensified campaigns and the nominees' diverse backgrounds.
Though the pro-democracy opposition only won three more seats than before, this time people like ``Longhair'' Leung Kwok-hung (
Whether China's "one country, two systems" policy can succeed in Hong Kong will influence its policy toward Taiwan as well as the power struggle among Beijing's leadership. This increases the international community's interest in the election.
Hong Kong voters expressed their desire for democracy; even the pro-Beijing Democratic Alliance for the Betterment of Hong Kong has campaigned for a direct election for the SAR chief executive. Future political reform will focus on this issue and direct elections for the legislative council in 2012.
Chief executive Tung Chee-hwa's (
It is worth noting that Beijing has learned much about elections from Taiwan and is playing a dual strategy.
On one hand, it is offering economic and infrastructure benefits, and is using its medal-winning Olympic athletes as nationalist icons. At the same time it is repressing opposition and using smear campaigns against its opponents. It has paid a price but still won the elections, and this is likely to give Beijing greater confidence in such situations.
The legislative elections were exciting, but as the council is unrelated to the territory's executive power, the result is not particularly relevant to Taiwan. But the DPP, in speaking to the international community, has repeatedly used the regression in Hong Kong's rule of law, democracy, human rights and media freedom as a reason why Taiwan cannot accept China's "one country, two systems" policy.
The nation should clarify its message, on the one hand encouraging Hong Kong's democratic aspirations and providing its residents with the benefit of our experience, while at the same time criticizing Beijing's strategies.
Reformists fought for 50 years against the authoritarian government of the Chinese Nationalist Party to achieve the democracy Taiwan has today. Many members of the international community also provided resources and support.
Hong Kongers face an even more powerful authoritarian government, and their aspiration to create democracy under the "one country, two systems" structure is wishful thinking. What Hong Kongers can achieve is to delay Chinese repression and win a little breathing space.
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS