Hong Kong might not be as democratic as Taiwan, but its Legislative Council (LegCo) used to run cleaner election campaigns than Taiwan -- with better rule of law, and less gangster involvement or corruption. This, however, is no longer the case. Such a change has a lot to do with China's intervention. As the Sept. 12 LegCo election approaches, more problems are becoming apparent.
First, Beijing attempts to control Hong Kong-based media with the help of gangsters -- a prelude to its oppression of the pro-democracy activists. The gang-sters have blackmailed talk show panelists who embrace justice. Beijing, in return, has rewarded them for their patriotism with closer ties. Rewards such as political titles and easy access to the Chinese market have also been given to the owners of media organizations who have chosen to side with Beijing in this election. No wonder most media organizations in Hong Kong have unleashed attacks on the pro-democracy activists, striking a major blow.
Second, China is conducting a smear campaign against the pro-democracy activists. It used to criticize the smear campaigns in Taiwan, but now it is resorting to every conceivable means. For example, the security department in Dongguan, Guangdong Province, arrested Democratic Party candidate Ho Wai To (何偉途) under the charge of procuring the services of prostitutes. Without being tried in court he was sentenced by the department to six months education in custody. The department also made his detailed "confession" public.
Third, China's intelligence agencies have also taken the initiative. A few weeks ago, some pro-democracy sympathizers writing in newspaper columns revealed that Chinese agents had been sent to Hong Kong to collect information against the pro-democracy camp. Unfortunately, some members of the camp ignored the warnings. As a result, not only was Ho arrested, but James To (涂謹申) was also accused of using public funds to rent a property.
The so-called "brain" of the Democratic Party, Law Chi-kwang (
Fourth, Beijing is carrying out operations in a manner similar to tactics used during the Boxer Rebellion. The "Boxer" figures in Hong Kong, often referred to as the Victoria Park Old Men, are veterans of the 1967 left-wing riots. Dismissed by society for decades, they have now regained their force and passionately attack the pro-democracy camp. They routinely insult democracy leaders with vulgar and violent language in the City Forum they hold every Sunday in the park. The harshest criticism is directed at legislators like Emily Lau (
Fifth, thieves and the like are also taking part. The main force in the pro-democracy camp, the Democratic Party, has not been their only target. Frontier, a political organization, and Albert Cheng (
Frontier convener Emily Lau's residence was broken into on Aug. 29 after she had gone out. The break-in was so professionally done that Lau did not immediately notice that it had happened when she returned, nor did she find anything missing. Yet the documents at her home could have been photographed. The only noticeable difference was a pair of socks that had been moved from a storage room and placed on a table. Lau could not guess the meaning of this.
Lau and Cheng, however, did not back off. Chen has campaigned many times in a pro-China electorate and been cornered by dozens of the Victoria Park old men. He turned to the police for help in maintaining order and protecting his safety.
Amid these odd happenings, Philip Wong (黃宜弘) was elected in a functional constituency without campaigning for it. He certainly has powerful connections.
Lau Chin-shek (劉千石), a pro-democracy heavyweight who advocates reconciliation with China, suddenly needed to show his filial duty last month (although his father has been dead for more than two decades). For this reason he did not take part in any electoral debates. Maybe he will still be able to win with the votes James To lost in the scandal over his rental property.
These incidents put the pro-democracy camp at a great disadvantage in the election. The camp lacks the ability to handle crises and has experienced a decline in public support. It has tried to reverse the situation by organizing a campaign convention, but Beijing may still work to disclose more information against it. Therefore, the situation does not look good.
Paul Lin is a political commentator based in New York.
Translated by Jennie Shih
Yesterday’s recall and referendum votes garnered mixed results for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). All seven of the KMT lawmakers up for a recall survived the vote, and by a convincing margin of, on average, 35 percent agreeing versus 65 percent disagreeing. However, the referendum sponsored by the KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on restarting the operation of the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County failed. Despite three times more “yes” votes than “no,” voter turnout fell short of the threshold. The nation needs energy stability, especially with the complex international security situation and significant challenges regarding
Most countries are commemorating the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II with condemnations of militarism and imperialism, and commemoration of the global catastrophe wrought by the war. On the other hand, China is to hold a military parade. According to China’s state-run Xinhua news agency, Beijing is conducting the military parade in Tiananmen Square on Sept. 3 to “mark the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II and the victory of the Chinese People’s War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression.” However, during World War II, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) had not yet been established. It
There is an old saying that if there is blood in the water, the sharks will come. In Taiwan’s case, that shark is China, circling, waiting for any sign of weakness to strike. Many thought the failed recall effort was that blood in the water, a signal for Beijing to press harder, but Taiwan’s democracy has just proven that China is mistaken. The recent recall campaign against 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators, many with openly pro-Beijing leanings, failed at the ballot box. While the challenge targeted opposition lawmakers rather than President William Lai (賴清德) himself, it became an indirect
A recent critique of former British prime minister Boris Johnson’s speech in Taiwan (“Invite ‘will-bes,’ not has-beens,” by Sasha B. Chhabra, Aug. 12, page 8) seriously misinterpreted his remarks, twisting them to fit a preconceived narrative. As a Taiwanese who witnessed his political rise and fall firsthand while living in the UK and was present for his speech in Taipei, I have a unique vantage point from which to say I think the critiques of his visit deliberately misinterpreted his words. By dwelling on his personal controversies, they obscured the real substance of his message. A clarification is needed to
RSS