What do former legislative speaker and People First Party (PFP) Legislator Liu Sung-fan (劉松藩), Yunlin County Commissioner Chang Jung-wei (張榮味), independent Legislator Yen Ching-piao (顏清標), Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Ho Chih-hui (何智輝), former Tuntex Group chairman Chen Yu-hao (陳由豪), and former KMT-turned independent legislator Wu Tzer-yuan (伍澤元) have in common?
The first thing that comes to mind is that they are all members of the pan-blue camp.
The second thing is that they all worked very hard stumping for KMT Chairman Lien Chan (
The third thing is that they all have been under criminal investigation and that they all have been convicted of one form of corruption or another.
One is left wondering why so many pan-blue politicians and supporters have a criminal record.
Huge kickback
During his tenure as legislative speaker, Liu received a huge kickback for helping the Kuangsan Group obtain a loan from the Taichung Business Bank. He was sentenced to four years in prison for breach of trust and given a NT$30 million fine, a sentence that is final and cannot be appealed.
Yen was sentenced to eight years in prison in accordance with the Statute for Punishment of Corruption (
He was also sentenced to 13 years for corruption and attempted murder after having ordered subordinates to spray a car full of people with bullets.
Chang has an even longer record, including possession of arms and vote buying during his tenures as Yunlin County Council speaker and vice speaker. He is also suspected of being involved with the land purchase for the Linnei township incinerator.
Ho was involved in the Chiuchun construction loan scandal.
Chen is an economic fugitive, while Wu was involved in the Sipiantou scandal involving a project to build a water-pumping station in Taipei County.
The crimes of Liu, Chang, Yen, Ho, Chen and Wu comprise what is called "black gold" politics to a tee.
Corruption
This begs the question: Does the pan-blue camp attract corrupt people, or does it produce them?
In light of their role as an opposition alliance following the 2000 and 2004 presidential elections, it is surprising they have not been able to shed their connection to "black gold" politics.
The cases of Ho and Wu hardly need mentioning. Liu's resignation from his position as PFP legislator-at-large is evidence that he would rather flee abroad than go to jail.
After all, he can still find refuge in China, where Chen, Wu and Tseng Cheng-jen (曾正仁) are waiting to form a "club" where they can regain strength, and during the next presidential election, the blue camp can rely on the support of their gangsters and will not need the support of Taiwanese businesspeople in China.
Chang, Yen and Liu all claim they are the victims of "political persecution."
Given this fact, the blue camp could make this their central focus during the next presidential campaign in order show voters how authoritarian the Democratic Progressive Party is.
Chin Heng-wei is editor-in-chief of Contemporary Monthly magazine.
Translated by Perry Svensson
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS