Recently, my job afforded me the opportunity to contact some old victims of the White Terror era.
One of them said he was extremely excited that Taiwan would be returned to the "motherland" after Japan was defeated in 1945.
He viewed China as his spiritual motherland, saying that nothing could surpass his passion for it.
Those who lived in this country at the time had a greater China consciousness, believing that they were the Han people whose ancestors originally moved from China to Taiwan, and that the "foreign regime" actually referred to the Japanese colonial government. Of course, for the nation's Aborigines, all regimes are foreign regimes.
The notorious 228 Incident in 1947 aroused the Taiwanese people's hostility towards the Chinese Nationalist Party's (KMT) rule.
Throughout the 1960s, the people lived in austere conditions. They could only focus on "increasing production to contribute to the country."
The country was almost cut off from the progressive and anti-war social movements that flourished thought in the West during this period.
After the 1979 Kaohsiung Incident, the opposition tangwai, or those "outside the KMT movement" gradually won public sympathy, and it united with the other social movements in the mid-80s.
A host of environmental, Aboriginal, labor and other social groups came together to oppose the KMT's authoritarian regime. Established in 1986, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) emerged from these forces.
The so-called Taiwan identity also began to take shape, stressing that the public must unite to fight the KMT's regime that oppresses the Taiwanese people.
Towards the end of the late president Chiang Ching-kuo's (
He swept away the obstacles to democratic politics and freedom of speech. His successor, former president Lee Teng-hui (
However, the issue of transitional justice in Taiwan's society was not appropriately handled. Some White Terror victims complain to this day that they should be compensated with the KMT's assets, not taxpayers' money, and that none of the oppressors of the past have been punished.
For them, Lee's apology was not enough, since the matter was unrelated to him.
Since the pan-blue camp's leaders have not seriously dealt with the issue of justice -- even though KMT Chairman Lien Chan (
Now that the blue-camp has once again lost the presidency, the they should bravely face the past and clearly define what they believe to be modern Taiwan-China relations.
They should also focus on today's social policy issues, shed the foreign regime label and strive toward the goal of serving the people of Taiwan.
Sun Ming-lin is the project planner of the documentary, Chiang Ching-kuo, produced by the Public Television Service (PTS) Foundation.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
US Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng (何立峰) are expected to meet this month in Paris to prepare for a meeting between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). According to media reports, the two sides would discuss issues such as the potential purchase of Boeing aircraft by China, increasing imports of US soybeans and the latest impacts of Trump’s reciprocal tariffs. However, recent US military action against Iran has added uncertainty to the Trump-Xi summit. Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) called the joint US-Israeli airstrikes and the