Every day the Central New Agency (CNA) sends press releases to media outlets. These press releases are regarded as "connecting copy" by these agencies, but how they use such copy varies. Sometimes it is used in its totality, sometimes partially used and sometimes simply discarded, serving as a prompt for the agency to send its own reporters to investigate.
But recently, the function of CNA's reports seems to have been overtaken by the publications of the Next Media Group's Apple Daily and Next magazine. It only takes one piece of news to be published by the magazine or newspaper for the story to be covered by other media outlets in the following days. Examples of how local media have followed up on stories first published by the Next Media Group are too numerous to list.
The reason that the stories in Next Media publications are often quoted or even imitated by other local media outlets is not so much because of their so-called tabloid news style, but because their perception of news value and their theory of reporting are completely different from those prevalent in the Taiwanese news media.
For example, although the Taiwanese media often engage in investigative reporting, they normally operate around specific cases or issues. In Next Media, the culture dictates that investigative methods are brought to bear routinely and in every instance. Beat reporters for the group do not have the title of investigative reporter, but they are deeply immersed in a culture of investigative reporting. While most reporters go around in press packs and cover superficial, scripted events, reporters for Next Media have their eyes open and their ears to the ground in search of the next big story.
Another example can be found in the case of Lo Shih Li-yun (
Using or following up on stories by other news agencies is something that happens all over the world, but only on an occasional basis, not as part of routine operations. The situation in this country where local media routinely chase stories first published by Next Media is unique. Any journalist must surely realize that this is nothing short of a crisis in the nation's news media.
If the news reported by the Next Media Group is of such importance that it is regularly followed up by competitors, then why haven't the local media agencies learned from Next Media's methods? Why don't they create their own home-grown Next magazine or Apple Daily? Why, after so many years, are they content to feed from the trough of Next Media's investigative journalism? The dignity of their competition is surely lacking.
Reporters working for powerful media organizations are often quoted or their work followed up by other marginal media outlets. So, local media should feel a sense of desperation at the fact that Next Media is usurping the role of news wire services like the CNA. This is not only a question of one media outlet outperforming another, but a degeneracy which cannot be ignored if Taiwan's media wants to be avoid being bumped out of the market by the people at Next Media Group.
Wang Chien-chuang is president of The Journalist magazine.
TRANSLATED BY Ian Bartholomew
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
On today’s page, Masahiro Matsumura, a professor of international politics and national security at St Andrew’s University in Osaka, questions the viability and advisability of the government’s proposed “T-Dome” missile defense system. Matsumura writes that Taiwan’s military budget would be better allocated elsewhere, and cautions against the temptation to allow politics to trump strategic sense. What he does not do is question whether Taiwan needs to increase its defense capabilities. “Given the accelerating pace of Beijing’s military buildup and political coercion ... [Taiwan] cannot afford inaction,” he writes. A rational, robust debate over the specifics, not the scale or the necessity,