Anyone who thinks the Chinese military threat against Taiwan is merely in the minds of the Taiwanese people, or that the situation is no one else's concern, couldn't be more wrong.
In a defense white paper released by the Japanese government on July 6, a strong emphasis was placed on the need for Japan to upgrade its defense capability in the face of the rapid modernization of the Chinese People's Liberation Army.
The white paper pointed to concerns over China's increasing military budget -- as high as 11 percent of the country's annual budget by this year -- and the frequent movements by Chinese navy vessels in Japan's exclusive economic zones. For those in this country, namely the pan-blue camp, who continue to see no dire need for Taiwan to upgrade its defense capabilities, Japan's white paper should come as a wake-up call. The threat posed by China is so far reaching that it should be a concern for the communist giant's neighbors. China's military threat has become a regional problem that should be dealt with collectively by all countries in East and Southeast Asia. Cooperation is needed to counter the rise of China's military.
Unfortunately, while countries such as Japan are beginning to see China for what it is -- the source of threats to regional peace -- very few are willing to take action to help counter it. Chinese military threats continue to be perceived by many as a headache for the Taiwanese alone. In fact, most countries in the region have kept silent when the Chinese government makes threats against Taiwan either orally or through military exercises.
Most countries have also chosen to turn a blind eye to the hundreds of missiles targeting Taiwan, failing to verbally condemn China for the deployment as they should.
China's neighbors in the region must be reminded that once a war breaks out in the Taiwan Strait, it will become a regional problem which will have serious economic, social and military consequences throughout Asia and, indeed, the world.
Thus far, China has made no effort to hide its ambition to become a regional and global military superpower. So after the PLA "deals with Taiwan," it is very likely that China will seek other countries to target next.
The Japanese defense white paper made comparisons between the military capabilities of China and Taiwan, and concluded that while the PLA has a much larger air force, navy and ground forces, Taiwan's military is more advanced and refined.
This delicate balance between the two sides of the strait may, however, tip in favor of China in the near future. These are facts that have been reiterated by people of vision in Taiwan. Yet, many if not most people in this country fail to take this threat seriously -- and the planned arms purchase by Taiwan from the US continues be held up while pan-blue lawmakers look for excuses to decline approval of the necessary budget.
Now that even Japan openly acknowledges China's military threat, perhaps the pan-blue camp will finally face reality. Knowing that the problem exists, however, is not enough. The question now is what we should do about it.
As pointed out by Japan's white paper, while Taiwan is no match for China in terms of size, the quality of Taiwan's military continues to lead. This is where Taiwan must continue to maintain its advantage -- to have small but sophisticated armed forces.
In order to accomplish this goal, in addition to personnel training, state-of-the-art arms systems must be acquired. Under the circumstances, one can only hope that the Legislative Yuan comes to its senses and approves the arms budget in a timely fashion.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of