On Friday, the Ministry of National Defense (MND) briefed an invited group of media representatives on its arms purchase proposals. This was obviously a MND attempt to seek popular support for the purchases against the backdrop of a continued deadlock between the Legislative Yuan and the Executive Yuan over the special arms purchase budget.
The MND is obviously in a hurry to have the deal sealed. As conceded by the Defense Minister Lee Jye (
Threats posed by China are another reason for the big hurry. Not only have China's annual military budgets grown by multiples, but the real figures are believed to be much higher -- estimates have put them at two to three times higher -- than the officially announced budgets.
While the concerns that the Legislative Yuan, or really the pan-blue opposition, have about the arms purchases are not entirely groundless, they pale in comparison with the nation's security needs.
One concern cited has been the likelihood of corruption and kickback commissions. Of course this skepticism comes from the nation's experience in connection with the purchase of Lafayette submarines from France in the 1990s.
However, this does not mean that Taiwan should stop purchasing arms altogether just to avoid a repeat of that kind of corruption. Instead, open and transparent information on pricing and negotiations can help reduce the likelihood of corruption.
As for the pan-blue lawmakers' request that the submarines proposed for purchase be manufactured here, the MND suggests there are feasibility issues. According to Li, lacking design, quality control and testing capabilities, after the state-owned China Shipbuilding (中船) completes construction of the submarines, it will face the same situation as Aerospace Industrial Development Corp (漢翔) did. After this company finished building fighter jets for the government, its manufacturing lines were shut down because no further orders were forthcoming. Moreover, many foreign governments have been unwilling to issue export permits required for some highly sensitive and sophisticated parts and components. Unless this problem is solved, China Shipbuilding's ability to build the submarines in question remains problematic.
Finally, there is the difficult issue of price. The pan-blue camp had asked that the total price of the arms purchase -- NT$610 billion -- be reduced by NT$200 billion in the event that China Shipbuilding cannot assemble the submarines. On the other hand, the pan-green camp is saying that the deal would be acceptable so long as the price is cut by NT$100 billion.
While efforts to cut prices should be appreciated, two things must be kept in mind -- they must be done for the right reasons (not merely to vex the government) and they must conform to the realistic situation of the market.
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
RSS