Democracy for China now
For most people who live in civilized societies, it is very difficult to understand the persistent threats from China against the Taiwanese government.
For the 1.3 billion Chinese, who do not own any property in Taiwan and do not have any voting rights, to claim Taiwan as their territory is also beyond comprehension. Moreover, for those Chinese who have never set foot in Taiwan to claim the right to rule over the Taiwanese merely due to similar ethnicity is not acceptable, not only in Taiwan but also around the world.
Many Taiwanese have in the past believed that the regimes from China would eliminate
the oppressive occupations of
foreign powers. Instead, their fellow ethnic Chinese have invariably persecuted Taiwanese far worse than the foreigners. The most recent example
is the Chinese Nationalist
Party (KMT), which treated Taiwanese as second-class
citizens. Within two years of
its arrival, the regime created shameful and rampant corruption that sparked a civilian
uprising; then it liquidated the finest of Taiwan's intellectuals who tried their best to assist the regime in ending the chaos.
The fact that they were lured into brutal executions by deception torments all Taiwanese, even after more than half a century. Four decades of suffocating repression -- Taiwan endured the world's longest martial-law regime -- followed that heinous atrocity.
Despite generations of
traumatic experiences, many Taiwanese still support the KMT in local and national elections. Many Taiwanese businesspeople also invest heavily in China, attesting to the strong affinity of some Taiwanese toward China. However, China's persistent military threats and its policy of isolating Taiwan reinforces the past's unbearable sufferings. Once again Taiwanese are demoted to second-class citizens and deprived of human dignity by China. In this sad historical context, Taiwanese are now
reluctantly distancing themselves from China, and they
believe that the current Chinese regime will do more harm to them than the KMT.
Nevertheless, many Taiwanese still earnestly hope that one day China will become a democracy. Then the conflict across the Taiwan Strait will
be solved within a mutually
acceptable system. Such a day is not near, as autonomy for Tibet and democracy in Hong Kong and China are losing ground, not to mention the worsening suppression of religious freedom and persecution of Falun Gong followers.
We entreat all Chinese officials to consider that it is to their own advantage to embrace democracy. In the current system, not a single individual will be protected from authoritarian rule. Many of your prominent predecessors suffered such a sad fate in the past. Sacrificing lives to achieve unification is outdated in modern society.
Please accept democracy now! It is just a simple change of attitude. Then you and your families as well as 1.3 billion Chinese will enjoy peaceful and civilized lives. The problems of Hong Kong, Taiwan, religions and Falun Gong will become irrelevant. You will gladly accept Taiwan independence and complete autonomy for Tibet and Hong Kong. His Holiness the Dalai Lama will happily return to Tibet and rejoice with all Tibetans for the restoration of their treasured culture. You will be the savior of not only China but also the entire world. Your past mistakes in sacrificing millions of innocent people in the name of communism and nationalism will be forgiven. You will bathe in the triumph of decency with ethnic Chinese around the globe.
Ming Chang, Albert Chen,
Ting Chen, Chi Su, Thomas Tsai and Samuel Yang
United States
Just who voided the ballots?
Thanks to Lee Chang-kuei (
I agree with the article except for Lee's contention that "the unusually high number of invalid ballots ... was caused by the newly adopted stricter criteria of validity, introduced to frustrate vote buying."
We know that these criteria had in fact been strongly manipulated by the KMT well before the election. It wasn't designed to frustrate vote buying, but was a trick to eliminate formerly valid ballots supporting the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). The KMT knew from experience that many DPP supporters were illiterate or aged people who would identify their choice not by the name or the number printed on the ballot but by the picture of the candidate. These voters would simply and innocently place a stamp on the picture -- and it would be counted as valid.
But this was not the case at this year's presidential election.
Around 300,000 invalid ballots were identified in the election -- so the trick worked as the KMT hoped. Yet the pan-blue camp filed a lawsuit demanding a recount because of the large number of invalid ballots.
As the saying goes, "He who plays tricks must be prepared to take a joke."
Janet Chang
Chiayi
Taiwan aims to elevate its strategic position in supply chains by becoming an artificial intelligence (AI) hub for Nvidia Corp, providing everything from advanced chips and components to servers, in an attempt to edge out its closest rival in the region, South Korea. Taiwan’s importance in the AI ecosystem was clearly reflected in three major announcements Nvidia made during this year’s Computex trade show in Taipei. First, the US company’s number of partners in Taiwan would surge to 122 this year, from 34 last year, according to a slide shown during CEO Jensen Huang’s (黃仁勳) keynote speech on Monday last week.
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
When China passed its “Anti-Secession” Law in 2005, much of the democratic world saw it as yet another sign of Beijing’s authoritarianism, its contempt for international law and its aggressive posture toward Taiwan. Rightly so — on the surface. However, this move, often dismissed as a uniquely Chinese form of legal intimidation, echoes a legal and historical precedent rooted not in authoritarian tradition, but in US constitutional history. The Chinese “Anti-Secession” Law, a domestic statute threatening the use of force should Taiwan formally declare independence, is widely interpreted as an emblem of the Chinese Communist Party’s disregard for international norms. Critics
RSS