In a follow-up to the stern statement China's Taiwan Affairs Office issued on May 24 that Beijing "does not welcome Taiwanese business people making money in China only to return to Taiwan to support Taiwanese independence," the People's Daily ran an article on its front page on May 31 criticizing Chi Mei Group founder Hsu Wen-lung (
Is China really preparing to put the screws on Taiwanese businessmen, or even to place Taiwan under an economic blockade? I don't think so. We should stay calm. China's attempt to achieve unification through economic means has not yet been accomplished, nor has China completely drained the country -- Taiwan still possesses capital, technology and outstanding industries, something China lacks.
Some people say that even if Taiwanese companies do not go to China, China will sooner or later obtain these technologies, capital and industries from other countries.
In the end, the issue is not that simple, because foreign manufacturers are not as magnanimous and generous as Taiwanese manufacturers, who, holding nothing back, provide China with the technologies and management skills she wants. Therefore, if China wants to develop a new industry with the help of some other foreign manufacturers, it will take much longer than if they had been relying on Taiwanese companies.
The wafer industry is one obvious example. China has implemented two consecutive five-year plans, the 908 and the 909 plans, aimed at developing its semiconductor industry. The 909 plan brought together well-known foreign semiconductor manufacturers, typified by Huahong NEC Electronics, a joint venture with NEC and Motorola's Tianjin plant, but all to no avail. China in the end only managed a breakthrough and subsequent take-off with the help of SMIC, a company that had left Taiwan.
China is now trying to invest in and develop its thin-film-transistor liquid crystal display industry together with NEC. Whether this joint venture will end up the same way as Huahong NEC did, with China looking to Taiwanese businessmen for help, remains to be seen. In other words, Taiwanese businesses remain China's first choice. As long as Taiwan possesses an industry China wants, Beijing will not kill the goose [Taiwanese businesspeople] that lays the golden eggs.
So, does this all mean that China will not impose economic sanctions against Taiwan? The answer would have to be that they absolutely will, it's just that the time is not yet ripe. In the event that Taiwan can no longer offer China things that it requires, or if China has already reached the point of satiation regarding these items, Beijing will show no hesitation in putting the screws on pro-green Taiwanese businesses and then on Taiwanese businesses in general.
Beijing will require them to make their allegiances known, and those that express loyalty to the idea of Taiwanese independence will be given a final ultimatum. After all, all of their capital is in China, and it can be taken away if need be. By that time, the Taiwanese economy will already be considerably weakened and fragile, and finance and the stock market will be in turmoil. China's grand project of achieving unification through economic means would thus have been completed.
China's three-pronged plan against Taiwan (that is, the Taiwan Affairs Office's criticism of pro-green businesses, the media attack on Hsu and the threat of economic sanctions) are certainly not policies improvised on the fly. To have arrived at this point they must have already gone through detailed evaluations and drills. Given that they have been able to intimidate pro-green Taiwanese businesses without adversely affecting Taiwanese investment in China, and have also increased the proportion of Taiwanese businesses seeing things their way, one could say that Beijing has managed to kill three birds with one stone.
And what is left for Taiwan in all this? Will we meekly accept humiliations and make concessions to save the situation, thus setting ourselves up for a death blow? In the aftermath of the attack on pro-green businesses by the Taiwan Affairs Office, the government should keep a watchful eye on the weaker side of human nature in businessmen, and take note of the droves of Taiwanese bosses going over to China, taking with them millions, or even billions of Taiwanese dollars in investment.
If they don't recognize the tell-tale signs here and fail to amend their consistent policy of economic development in China, the time when China will be levying these economic sanctions against Taiwan will not be far off. The more Taiwanese businesses go over to China, the sooner the time that Beijing is waiting for will be upon us!
Huang Tien-lin is a national policy adviser to the president.
TRANSLATED BY Paul Cooper and Perry Svensson
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS