When Hong Kong residents rallied to commemorate the fifteenth anniversary of the bloody Tiananmen Square crackdown, they mourned with a question in mind: Why did 1989's wave of democratization help end communist rule in Russia and across Eastern Europe, when at Tiananmen it heralded a rollback of people's rights that has lasted 15 years since then?
Princeton University professor Yu Ying-shih (
Earlier this year, some Beijing scholars described China's policy framework as "market economy, elite alliance, authoritarian politics," claiming that this framework will remain unchanged for the next 10 years. Such is the autocracy that has emerged in China since 1989. After a visit to southern China, the late Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平) gave the green light to a free-market economy, linking China's bureaucracy to international capital to strengthen the dictatorship's effectiveness.
This link between the bureaucracy and capital allows Deng to create an alliance of elites, buying support from the intellectual elite. By using superpower diplomacy and taking advantages of its role as "factory of the world" and its own huge market, China could force Western countries to make political compromises. In fact, China's authoritarian politics is just another name for one-party rule.
China has tightened its restrictions on news and publications; even references to the anti-rightist movement and the Cultural Revolution became taboo. The regime further enforces its rule using special agents and authoritarian measures to nip all possible unrest in the bud, including the high-tech monitoring of online media. Doubtlessly, the goal of China's "stability above all" is to maintain the existing order.
Under China's severe controls and softer tactics, the limited freedoms of 1989 have evapo-rated. Not only are rallies and demonstrations strictly regulated, but the iconic figures of the Tiananmen incident also disappeared from the contemporary political scene. These figures include Bao Tong (鮑彤) , Yen Chia-chi (嚴家其), Fang Lizhi (方勵之) , Liu Binyan (劉賓雁) and Liu Xiaobo (劉曉波), to name a few.
Two countries survive under the tiger's claws: Hong Kong and Taiwan. Although Hong Kong and Taiwan face different situations (Hong Kong's as "one country, two systems" and Taiwan's as "one country on either side of the strait") and their residents have different agendas, the people in Hong Kong and Taiwan share the same memory of the massacre.
As the interactions among Hong Kong, China and Taiwan become more frequent, the freedom and democracy Hong Kong and Taiwan enjoy certainly will impinge on China's one-party rule. China has switched its targets, eyeing Hong Kong and Taiwan with hostility.
Nonetheless, each armed with its own strengths, Hong Kong and Taiwan are able to stand up against China's unification campaigns to different degrees. Taiwan in particular has mature democratic institutions, so China's roar fails to intimidate.
Although Hong Kong is still struggling in the tiger's grip, its 6 million free people will never succumb to slavery. Their hope for democracy is expressed each year in a candlelight vigil that commemorates the Tiananmen tragedy.
Jin Zhong is the editor of Hong Kong-based Open Magazine.
Translated by Wang Hsiao-wen
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement
Out of 64 participating universities in this year’s Stars Program — through which schools directly recommend their top students to universities for admission — only 19 filled their admissions quotas. There were 922 vacancies, down more than 200 from last year; top universities had 37 unfilled places, 40 fewer than last year. The original purpose of the Stars Program was to expand admissions to a wider range of students. However, certain departments at elite universities that failed to meet their admissions quotas are not improving. Vacancies at top universities are linked to students’ program preferences on their applications, but inappropriate admission
RSS