China has been escalating its anti-Taiwan, anti-Chen Shui-bian (
First we had the Taiwan Affairs Office saying on Sunday that it would crush any attempt to seek Taiwan independence "at any cost." After Washington rightly called such remarks unhelpful, it was the turn Thursday of the Foreign Ministry to tell Taiwan not to "gamble on the mainland's tolerance" and to call Chen the "biggest threat" to regional peace.
We might hurt ourselves laughing if the situation was not so grave. Taiwan, a small island with defensive military forces only, whose only wish is to be left alone, is the biggest threat to regional peace?
We are gobsmacked by the audacity. This accusation comes from a power that regularly threatens Taiwan with attack -- and regularly has its military practice mock attacks on Taiwan. The same power gave Pakistan the technology and know-how to build nuclear weapons, has played a murky unclear role in its client state North Korea's nuclear program and has been the supplier of choice to a number of unpleasant regimes' chemical weapons programs.
We are immensely gratified therefore by the US House of Representatives' passage on Thursday of legislation to broaden military contacts with Taiwan. We can only hope that the Senate version of the bill also passes and that the White House has the wisdom to sign the measure into law.
What we particularly like about the bill is its frankness, namely that it seeks "to improve the defenses of Taiwan against attack by the People's Liberation Army." Of course that is exactly what the defense of Taiwan is all about, but it is refreshing to see the likely aggressor named.
The US action is, we understand, a Defense Department-inspired measure brought about by concerns that Taiwan's armed forces have declined in recent years in their ability to fend off an attack by China. It is not just the Defense Department that thinks this; it has become received wisdom overseas while being curiously little talked about here.
Of course it might be that the vastly increased cooperation between Taiwan and the US military that has already occurred during the George W. Bush administration has simply revealed Taiwan's forces to be by no means as good as the Americans had previously thought them to be. But US concerns are also cause for our concern.
Part of the problem is political. Weapons budgets need legislative approval, and the legislature is dominated by parties allied to China who have every interest in ensuring Taiwan's defenses remain weak. Another part is financial; Taiwan is an undertaxed country, the treasury of which has increasingly resembled Old Mother Hubbard's cupboard, as all parties have voted money for electorate-pleasing social programs without paying too much attention to where the money to pay for them should come from. The pan-blues' attempt to lower National Health Insurance contributions, irrespective of the fact that the program was facing imminent bankruptcy, was a typical example of this.
The president's inaugural address was full of good news but lacked substance on real problems. It's all very well to waffle about "23 million warm smiles descended from an ethnic rainbow," but it would have been nice if we had heard something about how the government's financial plight is to be addressed and about a determination to strengthen Taiwan's defenses.
Chen's address was about "paving the way for a sustainable Taiwan," but to be sustainable Taiwan has to be able to defend itself from its enemies, or rather enemy, since really there is only one. If Chen wants to talk about sustainability he has to face the unpleasant fact that Taiwan, like anywhere else, has to make the choice between guns and (more) butter.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS