The 57th World Health Assembly (WHA) meeting is due to begin tomorrow in Geneva. The WHA is the highest authority within the WHO, and any nation that can secure the support of over half the members of the WHA can join the WHO. Taiwan has been attempting to gain entry into the WHO since 1997 but success has evaded it as a result of Chinese diplomatic pressure.
The WHO's purpose is to ensure the basic human right of health for humanity, and the nation's request to join the organization is not merely the wish of the Taiwanese people but is also an appeal to humanitarianism.
Last year Taiwan stood isolated in its fight against the SARS epidemic, unable to call on the WHO for assistance. The WHO should allow the nation to take part in the international epidemic prevention system, so Taiwanese can receive protection.
The nation's attempt to join the WHO is fair, reasonable and legal. Leading up to this year's WHA meeting, members of the Medical Professionals Alliance (
Taiwan's chances of participating in the WHO increase every year. This year the government has again pursued observer status in the WHA in the capacity of a "health entity," citing four principles. These are that politics should not obstruct Taiwanese people's right to good health; that Taiwan is willing to share its public-health experience with the world; that the nation is willing to provide humanitarian aid to other countries; and that Taiwan is willing to participate in any project advocated by the WHO.
The concept of observer status as a health entity is only a transitional step, one which will lead to proper status in the future. Taiwan looks forward to the time when it can join forces with the international community and participate fully in WHO.
Being able to return something to the international community will not only be good for Taiwan, but will allow Taiwan to contribute to the world.
Chen Lung-chu is chairman of the New Century Foundation.
TRANSLATED BY PAUL COOPER
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS