Before moving to Manila two years ago, a Filipino lawmaker told me about election-related violence in his country.
At I listened to him, I could hardly believe my ears.
Now, I have come to understand that ballot-snatching, intimidation of voters and even assassinations are a sad reality in many parts of the Philippines. According to official sources, so far more than 60 people have been killed and many more injured in election-related violence.
With some 17 000 public positions up for grabs on May 10, the stakes are indeed high. While the media focus their attention on the national contests for the presidency, the vice presidency and a dozen senatorial slots, the vast majority of electoral battles are fought out on the local level. It is here that dozens of well-armed private armies operate and most of the violence occurs.
In discussions with Filipino friends and colleagues, I have discerned what could be termed a love-hate-relationship toward politics and politicians. On the one side, Filipinos say they are proud of their democracy, particularly the so called people-power revolution of 1986 that toppled the Ferdinand Marcos dictatorship and stands at the beginning of a global wave of democratization. On the other hand, the same people don't hide their revulsion for the political leadership of the country and the political system as a whole.
Perhaps in no other country do commentators write so disrespectfully about the political class as in the Philippines. One could assume that the public (and publicized) disgust of all things political would lead to political disenchantment and abstention. Interestingly, the opposite is the case; the Philippines has a tradition of high turnouts on election day.
Among the important issues taken up by political commentators during the ongoing electoral campaign has been the impact of the media on the voters. Most agree that this time the media -- and specifically TV -- play a decisive role. While the proliferation of television is proof of a certain economic advancement, observers deem that the spread of television has not been beneficial for the quality of the political discourse.
The dominant TV-channels no longer cater for the shrinking middle-class, but focus their attention on the members of the growing lower classes. Having followed the campaign from the beginning I have come to the conclusion that -- as a rule of thumb -- neither media nor politicians have a high regard of the intelligence of their audiences. Many politicians have turned their campaign rallies into entertainment shows. The media by and large seem to condone this practice, and sometimes journalists even participate in the political circus.
More than once candidates have told me that the voters are not interested in political issues and platforms but are solely attracted to political events by free food and entertainment. Should this indeed be the case, then no one else is to be blamed but the politicians themselves who are the creators of such vote-getting methods. There are many examples in the Philippines and other economically depressed countries where principled politicians attract voters with issue-based campaigns and don't rely on "bread and games."
With just over two weeks left, for all practical purposes the battle for the presidency has boiled down to a fight between President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo and former movie-star and high-school drop-out Fernando Poe Jr. Not only foreigners are puzzled how a candidate of the likes of Poe could become a serious contender for the highest position of the land in the first place.
Poe's much celebrated popularity is just one part of the answer. For decades, the Philippines has been governed by what may be termed professional politicians. In the eyes of many Filipinos their governance has not helped improve the lot of the great mass of the people. Many of the mainly poor Filipinos now rooting for Poe argue that their quality of life has actually gotten worse than better. Some statistics validate than assertion.
"All these past decades, where we have the so-called educated and experienced leaders, where have they brought the country? We've become the basket case of Asia," says Rod Reyes, a senior Poe aide.
According to recent opinion polls, Arroyo has not only caught up with Poe but actually gained a small lead. Meanwhile, the newest concern of political observers in Manila is a close outcome comparable to the result of the recent presidential elections in Taiwan.
"In that case, our country would be in turmoil", said a political analyst at a recent briefing in Makati City. "I am really afraid of a Taiwan scenario. Our people would not accept it, that's frightful."
Unlike Taiwan with its highly automated elections, vote-counting in the Philippines remains a largely manual exercise. Counting and processing the votes in this archaic fashion is not only time-consuming, but also susceptible to many forms of electoral fraud. Not surprisingly, poll-watching and protecting the votes traditionally play an important role in the
electoral strategies of all candidates and political parties. The opposition has accused the president of plotting to rig the elections.
For all I know, Arroyo has thus far not reacted to what in most other democracies would be considered an outrageous allegation. But in the Philippines, in the run-up to elections the contenders are accustomed to all sorts of attacks and accusations. Much of what the candidates say is actually not taken at face value. Elections and campaigns follow their own rules. It is heartening that concerned citizens and a small group of enlightened politicians are working to change these rules for the better.
Ronald Meinardus is the resident representative of the Friedrich-Naumann Foundation in the Philippines and a commentator on Asian affairs.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS