Despite the opposition's continued refusal to accept the outcome of the presidential election, the result is a watershed for reshaping the nation's political landscape. It not only granted President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) a new mandate to continue reforms with more than 50 percent of the vote, it also increased the chances of the pan-green camp gaining a majority in the Legislative Yuan at year's end.
That explains why the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has been busy drawing up plans for the December legislative elections. If the DPP, along with its green-camp
partner, the Taiwan Solidarity Union, can win more than half of the legislature's seats, then the full transfer of political power will have finally been accomplished.
With the opposition camp having opposed Chen for four years by blocking everything he has proposed, the only effective way to bring healthy competition back to national politics is to let the president do his job
-- with solid support from the legislature.
Strategically speaking, Chen and the DPP's top priority is not to attract more defectors from the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) to cobble together a majority in the legislature; rather, it is to initiate reform of the Legislative Yuan itself.
During the presidential election, the pan-blue camp echoed Chen's call for a reduction in
the number of legislative seats. Whether or not the KMT and the People First Party (PFP) will stand by this is doubtful, but it is in any event Chen's job to make use of public support for legislative reform in the next election campaign and thus pave the way for a constructive second term.
It is generally acknowledged that current political instability is the result of conflict between the DPP government and the opposition in the Legislative Yuan. Several public surveys have named the opposition as the main source of political disorder. Reducing the number of seats in the legislature and reforming the electoral system have not only attracted popular support but are also a political necessity.
Overhauling the single non-transferable system of voting will also contribute to the success of legislative reform. The system is nothing less than a cancer within this democracy. As long as legislators are able to secure an often minimal core vote, they can do whatever they like in obstructing the legislative process or humiliating government officials. The lack of legislative efficiency is also closely associated with this voting system.
In this regard, constitutional change, as Chen said during the campaign, is needed when it comes to reforming the electoral process. The aim of this
is to enhance the legitimacy
of individual legislators and
clean up and make efficient the proceedings of the legislature as a whole.
A smart leader measures the public pulse and executes timely and decisive reforms. Chen has been entrusted with Taiwan's continuing democratization by voters. The reform of the Legislative Yuan is the first step toward building a mature civil society and mature political institutions.
As the KMT and the PFP entangle themselves in finger-pointing and struggle to work out a strategy choosing candidates for the legislative poll, the DPP should seize its opportunity and offer a clear and feasible reform agenda to voters.
There is no time for Chen and his party to be complacent about their victory, for greater challenges lie ahead. Whoever can ride this momentum will win public support later this year.
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
RSS