Despite the opposition's continued refusal to accept the outcome of the presidential election, the result is a watershed for reshaping the nation's political landscape. It not only granted President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) a new mandate to continue reforms with more than 50 percent of the vote, it also increased the chances of the pan-green camp gaining a majority in the Legislative Yuan at year's end.
That explains why the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has been busy drawing up plans for the December legislative elections. If the DPP, along with its green-camp
partner, the Taiwan Solidarity Union, can win more than half of the legislature's seats, then the full transfer of political power will have finally been accomplished.
With the opposition camp having opposed Chen for four years by blocking everything he has proposed, the only effective way to bring healthy competition back to national politics is to let the president do his job
-- with solid support from the legislature.
Strategically speaking, Chen and the DPP's top priority is not to attract more defectors from the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) to cobble together a majority in the legislature; rather, it is to initiate reform of the Legislative Yuan itself.
During the presidential election, the pan-blue camp echoed Chen's call for a reduction in
the number of legislative seats. Whether or not the KMT and the People First Party (PFP) will stand by this is doubtful, but it is in any event Chen's job to make use of public support for legislative reform in the next election campaign and thus pave the way for a constructive second term.
It is generally acknowledged that current political instability is the result of conflict between the DPP government and the opposition in the Legislative Yuan. Several public surveys have named the opposition as the main source of political disorder. Reducing the number of seats in the legislature and reforming the electoral system have not only attracted popular support but are also a political necessity.
Overhauling the single non-transferable system of voting will also contribute to the success of legislative reform. The system is nothing less than a cancer within this democracy. As long as legislators are able to secure an often minimal core vote, they can do whatever they like in obstructing the legislative process or humiliating government officials. The lack of legislative efficiency is also closely associated with this voting system.
In this regard, constitutional change, as Chen said during the campaign, is needed when it comes to reforming the electoral process. The aim of this
is to enhance the legitimacy
of individual legislators and
clean up and make efficient the proceedings of the legislature as a whole.
A smart leader measures the public pulse and executes timely and decisive reforms. Chen has been entrusted with Taiwan's continuing democratization by voters. The reform of the Legislative Yuan is the first step toward building a mature civil society and mature political institutions.
As the KMT and the PFP entangle themselves in finger-pointing and struggle to work out a strategy choosing candidates for the legislative poll, the DPP should seize its opportunity and offer a clear and feasible reform agenda to voters.
There is no time for Chen and his party to be complacent about their victory, for greater challenges lie ahead. Whoever can ride this momentum will win public support later this year.
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations