Despite the opposition's continued refusal to accept the outcome of the presidential election, the result is a watershed for reshaping the nation's political landscape. It not only granted President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) a new mandate to continue reforms with more than 50 percent of the vote, it also increased the chances of the pan-green camp gaining a majority in the Legislative Yuan at year's end.
That explains why the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has been busy drawing up plans for the December legislative elections. If the DPP, along with its green-camp
partner, the Taiwan Solidarity Union, can win more than half of the legislature's seats, then the full transfer of political power will have finally been accomplished.
With the opposition camp having opposed Chen for four years by blocking everything he has proposed, the only effective way to bring healthy competition back to national politics is to let the president do his job
-- with solid support from the legislature.
Strategically speaking, Chen and the DPP's top priority is not to attract more defectors from the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) to cobble together a majority in the legislature; rather, it is to initiate reform of the Legislative Yuan itself.
During the presidential election, the pan-blue camp echoed Chen's call for a reduction in
the number of legislative seats. Whether or not the KMT and the People First Party (PFP) will stand by this is doubtful, but it is in any event Chen's job to make use of public support for legislative reform in the next election campaign and thus pave the way for a constructive second term.
It is generally acknowledged that current political instability is the result of conflict between the DPP government and the opposition in the Legislative Yuan. Several public surveys have named the opposition as the main source of political disorder. Reducing the number of seats in the legislature and reforming the electoral system have not only attracted popular support but are also a political necessity.
Overhauling the single non-transferable system of voting will also contribute to the success of legislative reform. The system is nothing less than a cancer within this democracy. As long as legislators are able to secure an often minimal core vote, they can do whatever they like in obstructing the legislative process or humiliating government officials. The lack of legislative efficiency is also closely associated with this voting system.
In this regard, constitutional change, as Chen said during the campaign, is needed when it comes to reforming the electoral process. The aim of this
is to enhance the legitimacy
of individual legislators and
clean up and make efficient the proceedings of the legislature as a whole.
A smart leader measures the public pulse and executes timely and decisive reforms. Chen has been entrusted with Taiwan's continuing democratization by voters. The reform of the Legislative Yuan is the first step toward building a mature civil society and mature political institutions.
As the KMT and the PFP entangle themselves in finger-pointing and struggle to work out a strategy choosing candidates for the legislative poll, the DPP should seize its opportunity and offer a clear and feasible reform agenda to voters.
There is no time for Chen and his party to be complacent about their victory, for greater challenges lie ahead. Whoever can ride this momentum will win public support later this year.
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS