While the opposition is still entangled with post-election political disputes and its own problems of power redistribution, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has initiated inter-party reform with proposals it introduced last week. These electoral reforms aim at eliminating factional manipulation of party members and paving the way for more fair and open competition.
The DPP's attempts at internal reform not only displayed the party's capacity for self-examination but also demonstrated that President Chen Shui-bian (
The art of leadership is to maintain sufficient momentum to steer public policy without losing public support. An idealistic leader will not hesitate to do something unpopular. But a smart idealist will carefully measure public opinion before he does so, and will develop a strategy to persuade the electorate.
Ill outcomes result when timid, tepid governance leaves initiatives to the opposition. This reduces a political leader to a gambler, dependent on good times and luck to take him where he wants to go. The Chen administration has learned a great lesson from opposition boycotts and from its own mistakes in four years.
With a new mandate, the ruling party should reconstruct its contract with the people and try to convince them that the nation is heading in the right direction. By incorporating reforms, the DPP opened a gate to remold Taiwanese politics toward mature democracy.
The DPP's primary system has long been criticized by the public because it breeds factional nepotism. When the party won a second presidential election, the leadership introduced reforms that position the DPP as the foremost hope to deepen democracy in the country.
After his first term, Chen recognized the enormous difficulties involved in forging a national consensus on key policy areas, and the recent election has further polarized political forces.
To govern successfully, Chen must avoid serving his own party's extremists and ideologues. He must transcend party interests and appeal to political moderates, seeking common ground. If he can transcend special interests, then he can win primaries in his own party by appealing to moderate rank-and-file voters.
In politics, the most lethal wounds are inflicted from the rear. An elected president who seeks to reach beyond his party's base and appeal to the swing voters his electoral fortunes depend on invites assault from his own ranks.
Facing domestic and external challenges, Chen must display a stronger will to take care of majority interests, not just those of his own party. It is from the center that leaders must lead. Each party has its own center that is more moderate than its leaders or its campaign donors. By reaching out to that center, an elected leader can escape being the prisoner of his own party stalwarts.
Chen must keep in mind that leadership is a dynamic tension between where a politician thinks his country should go and where voters want it to go. Bold initiatives that leave the voters behind are not acts of leadership but of self-indulgent arrogance. The key is not to abjure change but to seek it with political wisdom and skills of persuasion.
Self-initiated and incessant reform is the most responsible way of building public trust in the DPP. The ruling party has served as a good example of this so far. How will the opposition meet the same challenge?
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS