On saturday, the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA) celebrated its 25th anniversary. Former US president Jimmy Carter terminated the 25-year-old Mutual Defense Treaty between the US and the Republic of China (ROC), and in return, established diplomatic ties with the People's Republic of China (PRC) on Jan. 1, 1979. To bridge the vacuum in Taiwan's national security after the abolishment of the treaty, the US Congress ratified the TRA in April 1979. After being signed and promulgated by the US president, the TRA took effect as part of the US domestic law so as to to fulfill the US commitment to assist Taiwan to defend itself. Special in its status, the TRA continues to be the legal cornerstone of the "non-diplomatic" relationship between Taiwan and the US.
Aimed at protecting stability and security in Taiwan and facilitating economic, social and cultural exchanges between Taiwan and the US, the TRA regulates the US executive and legislative branches in handling Taiwan-related affairs. This act includes several important principles, as follows:
First, Taiwan is viewed almost as a state and enjoys all due treatments given to a state in the US. In the act, Taiwan is officially called "Taiwan" instead of "Republic of China."
Second, the act ties Taiwan's security closely to the US defense network in the Western-Pacific region. Once Taiwan's security is threatened, the US government will pay attention. All issues regarding Taiwan's future must be resolved peacefully.
Third, to help maintain peace, security and stability in the region, the US offers Taiwan arms sales in necessary quantities to equip it with adequate self-defense abilities.
Fourth, to promote democracy and protect the human rights of the Taiwanese people, the US helps Taiwan to cultivate and expand its diplomatic space in international organizations.
Fifth, the TRA and the Three Communiques (Shanghai Communique, Communique Establishing US-PRC Diplomatic Relations and the US-PRC Joint Communique on arms sales) lay the groundwork for the US "one China" policy. Although the TRA and the Three Communiques are often viewed as equals, the TRA is superior to the Three Communiques in view of the US constitutional system. While the TRA was passed by the US Congress and takes effect as a US domestic law, the Three Communiques is merely an "administrative agreement" between the US president and China. The US Congress takes no part in the Three Communiques.
Over the past 25 years, the TRA has made a significant contribution to maintain peace, security and stability in the Taiwan Strait and preserved space for Taiwan's democracy to thrive into the future. When China threatened Taiwan with its missile rehearsal during Taiwan's first-ever direct presidential election in 1996, the US sent the aircraft carrier Nimitz to make a run through the Taiwan Strait and to resolve the crisis -- strong proof of the TRA's efficacy. In the face of China's more than 500 missiles aimed at Taiwan and its stepping up military intimidation, the TRA's role appears increasingly indispensible.
The March 20 presidential election and the referendum are already in the past. Democracy in Taiwan has grown deeper roots. In commemoration of the TRA's 25th anniversary, the people and the government of Taiwan expect China to withdraw the missiles aimed at Taiwan, to establish a safety mechanism on the footing of mutual trust, to pave the way for permanent peace in and mutual prosperity across the Taiwan Strait.
Chen Lung-chu is the chair-man of Taiwan New Century Foundation.
Translated by Wang Hsiao-wen
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers