On saturday, the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA) celebrated its 25th anniversary. Former US president Jimmy Carter terminated the 25-year-old Mutual Defense Treaty between the US and the Republic of China (ROC), and in return, established diplomatic ties with the People's Republic of China (PRC) on Jan. 1, 1979. To bridge the vacuum in Taiwan's national security after the abolishment of the treaty, the US Congress ratified the TRA in April 1979. After being signed and promulgated by the US president, the TRA took effect as part of the US domestic law so as to to fulfill the US commitment to assist Taiwan to defend itself. Special in its status, the TRA continues to be the legal cornerstone of the "non-diplomatic" relationship between Taiwan and the US.
Aimed at protecting stability and security in Taiwan and facilitating economic, social and cultural exchanges between Taiwan and the US, the TRA regulates the US executive and legislative branches in handling Taiwan-related affairs. This act includes several important principles, as follows:
First, Taiwan is viewed almost as a state and enjoys all due treatments given to a state in the US. In the act, Taiwan is officially called "Taiwan" instead of "Republic of China."
Second, the act ties Taiwan's security closely to the US defense network in the Western-Pacific region. Once Taiwan's security is threatened, the US government will pay attention. All issues regarding Taiwan's future must be resolved peacefully.
Third, to help maintain peace, security and stability in the region, the US offers Taiwan arms sales in necessary quantities to equip it with adequate self-defense abilities.
Fourth, to promote democracy and protect the human rights of the Taiwanese people, the US helps Taiwan to cultivate and expand its diplomatic space in international organizations.
Fifth, the TRA and the Three Communiques (Shanghai Communique, Communique Establishing US-PRC Diplomatic Relations and the US-PRC Joint Communique on arms sales) lay the groundwork for the US "one China" policy. Although the TRA and the Three Communiques are often viewed as equals, the TRA is superior to the Three Communiques in view of the US constitutional system. While the TRA was passed by the US Congress and takes effect as a US domestic law, the Three Communiques is merely an "administrative agreement" between the US president and China. The US Congress takes no part in the Three Communiques.
Over the past 25 years, the TRA has made a significant contribution to maintain peace, security and stability in the Taiwan Strait and preserved space for Taiwan's democracy to thrive into the future. When China threatened Taiwan with its missile rehearsal during Taiwan's first-ever direct presidential election in 1996, the US sent the aircraft carrier Nimitz to make a run through the Taiwan Strait and to resolve the crisis -- strong proof of the TRA's efficacy. In the face of China's more than 500 missiles aimed at Taiwan and its stepping up military intimidation, the TRA's role appears increasingly indispensible.
The March 20 presidential election and the referendum are already in the past. Democracy in Taiwan has grown deeper roots. In commemoration of the TRA's 25th anniversary, the people and the government of Taiwan expect China to withdraw the missiles aimed at Taiwan, to establish a safety mechanism on the footing of mutual trust, to pave the way for permanent peace in and mutual prosperity across the Taiwan Strait.
Chen Lung-chu is the chair-man of Taiwan New Century Foundation.
Translated by Wang Hsiao-wen
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of