The results of the March 20 presidential election have not only reshaped Taiwan's domestic politics but have also created a window of opportunity for China's leaders to readjust their strategy toward President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) administration.
Noting that international concerns center on whether or not Chen's victory will have an instant effect on the stalemated cross-strait situation, Chen provided an immediate answer to the world community by saying that his re-election would result in a continued effort by his administration to pursue peaceful interactions with Beijing.
In addition to reiterating that his plan to change the Constitution in 2006 will have no bearing on the cross-strait status quo, Chen called for the US to play a constructive role as mediator and urge Beijing to restart talks with Taipei.
Beijing played down Chen's victory and took advantage of the post-election political turmoil in Taipei to claim that there might be a need for Beijing to "step in." Beijing also poured cold water on Chen's victory by stealing one of Taiwan's diplomatic allies, Dominica. Beijing's initial reaction displayed no respect for the democratically elected Chen.
The question is: Can Beijing maintain for another four years its policy of having no contact with the Chen administration?
China must at least recognize two factors when it comes to the question of how to deal with Chen.
The first factor is the rise of Taiwanese consciousness.
The fact that Chen was able to increase his voter support from 39.3 percent in 2000 to 50.1 percent this year -- and that he increased his vote total by nearly 1.5 million votes -- should not be overlooked by Beijing. Most people tend to attribute the growth of Chen's support to the rise of Taiwanese consciousness.
With a new mandate and over 7 million referendum votes cast in support of peaceful interaction with Beijing, Chen ac-quired enough legitimacy to generate domestic consensus on cross-strait policy. Under these circumstances, Beijing will have no choice but to face political reality and open the door to Chen.
The new generation of Chinese leadership, led by technocrats such as President Hu Jintao (
The second factor that Beijing must keep in mind involves the extent to which events in Hong Kong could generate pressure on the Chinese leadership. The experiment of the "one country, two systems" approach in Hong Kong has produced nothing but added restrictions on Hong Kongers' political freedom. In addition, Hong Kong's economy has deteriorated.
Beijing's recent attempts to dictate policy on political reforms in Hong Kong -- which include a proposal to directly elect the head of the territory by 2007 -- have widely been perceived as a "preventive means" of countering Taiwan's democratic progress. The question is: Can the emerging democratic forces in the territory be oppressed forever?
The cross-strait relationship has entered a new phase that will entail searching for common ground. China's strategy of siding with Taiwan's opposition and undermining Chen's power in the past four years has proved to be a total failure. China must adjust its approach toward the Chen administration. In short,China must live with Chen.
Chen's pledge to maintain the status quo and push for the establishment of a peaceful framework for cross-strait interaction should be treated seriously by Beijing. A window of opportunity for cross-strait reconciliation has opened. Both sides should take advantage of it.
Liu Kuan-teh is a political commentator based in Taipei.
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
RSS