She may wince now with pain from shaking the hands of so many voters, but South Korean opposition party leader Park Geun-hye could yet emerge from next week's parliamentary election with a smile.
Political analysts say her conservative Grand National Party will certainly no longer dominate the single-chamber National Assembly, where it held more than half the seats and often thwarted Korean President Roh Moo-hyun's reform plans.
But it could win significantly more seats than many thought after the party voted to impeach Roh on March 12 and bombed in the opinion polls for misjudging the public mood.
ILLUSTRATION: MOUNTAIN PEOPLE
Anything short of a rout for a party tainted by corruption scandals would be success in the turbulent world of South Korean politics -- a world in which the left-leaning, pro-Roh Uri Party surged from being just a splinter group to a position where it could secure a big majority in the new 299-seat parliament.
"Maybe a few weeks ago we were talking about a devastating defeat for the Grand National Party. But now no longer," said political commentator Shim Jae-hoon, who saw the opposition party winning about 100 seats.
"Passions are cooling, the impeachment bubble is bursting and people are recovering a sense of stability."
Other political analysts said the Grand National Party was likely to secure between 80 and 120 seats -- more than the opinion polls suggested in the run-up to the campaign.
Shim and other political analysts said that did not mean the Grand National Party's future was assured in a transitional period in which the divide is increasingly between generations rather than the regions that have for so long played the decisive role in parliamentary and presidential elections.
"Park is making efforts to reform the Grand National Party, but it will take time to judge whether the efforts are successful," said Kim Il-young, a political scientist at Seoul's Sungkyunkwan University.
Park, whose father Park Chung-hee ruled South Korea from a 1961 coup until he was gunned down by his own intelligence chief in 1979, said this week the most urgent task was to apologize to the people and change the party's negative image.
"To be reborn as a clean and policy-focused party is the only way to recover the people's trust," she said.
The analysts said the gestation period may prove long.
"Although the Roh government made lots of mistakes, the Grand National Party also lost its moral ground," said Kim Kwang-dong, a political scientist at Seoul's Korea University.
He said the scandal concerning illegal political funding, which has hit most parties but hurt the Grand National Party the most, had undermined the party's position. Shim agreed.
"The Grand National Party has had a number of problems, one of which is that it is too deeply tainted with corruption," he said. "In fact, the amount of illegal campaign funding that it shook down from the business community went up to something like $70 billion won (US$60 million), which was unprecedentedly high."
Shim said the Grand National Party had failed to move swiftly to address a growing generation gap. Roh was elected by young voters who now back the Uri Party, have less hardline views on North Korea and are less wedded to unfettered market economics.
"Everywhere you see the new-generation voters are challenging the old accepted norms," he said.
Nam Y. Lee of Sookmyung Women's University in Seoul said it was far from clear the Grand National Party was re-inventing itself and that the effect of Park Geun-hye's March 23 election as leader on the party's standing was probably limited.
"There were already people who opposed an Uri Party landslide and want to check its complete seizure of power," he said.
"In this sense, Park Geun-hye merely offered them a reason to support the Grand National Party."
Opinion polls are banned in the last two weeks of the campaign, so the effect of recent events such as security scares in Iraq and economic data is difficult to judge.
Uri Party leader Chung Dong-young got off to a bad start last week when he had to join the line of contrite leaders for telling old people to stay at home and let the young decide the future.
Most analysts say the comment is unlikely to play hugely in the Grand National Party's favor because of the generation split but could dissuade some young people with traditional Confucian values that honor the elderly from voting for the Uri Party.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
RSS