The days ahead for Hong Kong's unpopular Chief Executive Tung Chee-hwa
Apart from nursing a fragile economy, Tung has to answer pressing local demands for more democracy while trying not to alarm communist leaders in Beijing worried that these aspirations pose a challenge to its authority in the territory.
ILLUSTRATION: YU SHA
Underlining Chinese fears about quick democratization, China's parliament last Tuesday re-interpreted clauses in Hong Kong's constitution giving Beijing full control over how and when the city may choose its leader and lawmakers.
But this interpretation says that while China has the power to decide if electoral reforms are needed, it is up to Tung to propose and lobby Chinese leaders for any change -- putting the Beijing-backed former shipping tycoon in an unenviable position.
"Hong Kong people will now put even more pressure on Tung," said Ivan Choy, a politics professor at City University.
"If he ignores calls for reforms and fails to submit a reform proposal, his government will face a huge challenge."
While the 66-year-old Tung can in theory initiate reforms, his hands are tied and he is at the mercy of Beijing, which is greatly unnerved by growing calls in the past year in Hong Kong for universal suffrage from as soon as 2007.
Beijing fears such ambitions could escalate into demands for independence, embolden Taiwan on a breakaway course and spawn similar grassroots movements on the mainland.
"If Tung wants to submit a reform proposal, he is likely to consult Beijing first. If he doesn't submit a proposal, then it's most likely because Beijing asked him not to," Choy said.
Any failure by Tung to make such a proposal is sure to invite more criticism against him.
a DIFFICULT TASK
Apart from being able to veto any proposed reform, China now has the authority to decide if changes are even needed.
The change comes after China amended its Constitution last month to guarantee human rights as it seeks to adapt a revolutionary communist ideology to its increasingly capitalist system.
Hong Kong was meant to embody that dichotomy: a world-class financial center that can flourish under the nurturing hand of the communist motherland.
But last year's "people power" demonstrations showed that a relatively wealthy citizenry with a per capita income of almost US$25,000 is yearning for the right to choose its leaders as well as the right to make money.
While democracy champions see China's re-interpretation as dousing hopes for universal suffrage in the near future, they have vowed to continue fighting as Beijing has not explicitly ruled out the possibility of electoral reforms from 2007.
This presents a crucial test for Tung, whose administration plunged into crisis after 500,000 people took to the streets last July in Hong Kong's biggest protest in over a decade over Beijing's demand for an anti-subversion law.
Tung was forced to shelve the planned law.
Now the reticent billionaire has a golden opportunity to shed his stolid image and try to woo popular support, said Yip Kwok-wah, head of a pro-government think tank.
"If Mr Tung wants to make a contribution to Hong Kong and have his name go down nicely in history, I would advise him to aggressively and actively work on constitutional development, so as to get the support of Beijing on the one hand and of Hong Kong people on the other," Yip said.
SOPHISTICATED GAME
The daily South China Morning Post called on Tung's government to play a more sophisticated game.
"There is little to be gained by making blanket demands for universal suffrage. A more sophisticated and flexible approach is required," the newspaper said in an editorial. "There is a need to work hard on negotiating with the central government. This means being prepared to persuade, to reassure and perhaps to compromise."
The row has already attracted a great deal of international attention.
Expressions of concern from the US, Hong Kong's second largest trading partner, have earned sharp rebukes from Beijing and even Hong Kong's government.
Politics lecturer Sonny Lo warned that Tung risked more social unrest if he failed to bridge the growing rift between Hong Kong's aspirations and Beijing's fears.
"If the gap between the government and opposition grows, it's a recipe for chaos, political unrest and tension," Lo said.
Rather than muffle calls for democracy, analysts said the re-interpretation, seen by citizens as intervention by Beijing, may even boost support for the opposition pro-democracy camp and help it win a majority in legislative elections in September.
That would further alarm Beijing and pose a tremendous challenge to Tung, as the opposition would then be in a position to veto important policies.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS