During the second post-election meeting of the Chinese Nationalist Party's (KMT) Central Standing Committee on Wednesday, KMT lawmaker Hung Yu-chin (
Hung's proposal was significant primarily because it officially opened discussions within the KMT about the future path and direction of the party. According to the localization faction, the KMT-People First Party (PFP) Alliance suffered a defeat in this past presidential election because it had drifted away from mainstream popular will -- which is becoming increasingly Taiwan-centric, along with the rapid evolution of a sense of Taiwanese national identity.
Actually, a better way to put it is that the pan-blue camp has failed to keep up with the changing popular will, as they continue to cling on to not only outdated ideologies, such as "there is one China, that being the Republic of China (ROC)," but a general sense of the "Greater China" consciousness.
Indeed, the assassination attempt on President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and Vice President Annette Lu (呂秀蓮) gave the KMT an excuse to run away from reality and to turn their back against the need to re-examine its path. As many have pointed out, the pan-blues should stop thinking about the number of votes they might have lost because of the shooting, and think about the number of votes they lost since the previous presidential election. The number of votes garnered by KMT Chairman Lien Chan (連戰) and PFP Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) in this past election decreased by more than 1 million in comparison with the number of votes they garnered in 2000.
It is plain that the shooting could not have impacted that many votes, if it impacted any at all. But because the pan-blue alliance continues to be obsessed and preoccupied with the idea that "two bullets" overturned the entire election, they have refused to concede that something is wrong with their path and direction. If adjustments are not made, more voters will support the pan-greens and the KMT will no longer be able to play the role of a strong opposition, which can only be bad for both the party and the democratic development of Taiwan.
Currently, the KMT is at a crossroads. It can either shift toward the middle and adopt a more moderate path or embark on a more radical pro-China and pro-unification direction, led by the PFP and the New Party. The KMT's decision will more than likely result in a split within the party, which would not be the first of its kind that has resulted from similar internal struggles.
The two prior struggles, which took place when Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) was the party's chairman, resulted in the departure of the pro-China factions, which first gave birth to New Party and then to the PFP.
The situation is further complicated by the fact that what Lien has in mind is obviously not just the future of the party but how to preserve his reign over it as well. If he listens to the localization faction, then there is the immediate pressure of a power succession within the party by the leader of the localization faction, Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (
If Lien goes the other route, lawmakers from the localization faction may leave and join with the pan-greens, giving them a legislative majority.
What will be Lien's decision?
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
US Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng (何立峰) are expected to meet this month in Paris to prepare for a meeting between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). According to media reports, the two sides would discuss issues such as the potential purchase of Boeing aircraft by China, increasing imports of US soybeans and the latest impacts of Trump’s reciprocal tariffs. However, recent US military action against Iran has added uncertainty to the Trump-Xi summit. Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) called the joint US-Israeli airstrikes and the
RSS