The Central Election Commis-sion (CEC) announced on the night of March 20 after all ballots were counted that President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) won re-election. However, the pan-blue losers took to the streets with very serious accusations of irregularities. The intense demonstration on election night has continued without any end in sight.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (
For anyone who knows about the well-established balloting procedures in this country, vote-rigging is only in the memory of the past KMT authoritarianism.
In the elections nowadays, after the polls close, the ballot boxes are opened and ballots counted openly in front of any interested citizen who wants to attend. In addition, it has become common for representatives from different political parties to conduct onsite supervision of the counting. In Saturday's election, the same procedures were followed. The ballot-counting process was as transparent as it could be and not a single problem was cited by any one.
The demand of the pan-blue camp has shifted since the night of March 20 when Lien proposed a "review" of the ballots. A few hours later, the attorneys repre-senting the pan-blue camp sued the CEC to invalidate the election and demand the court seal all ballots. Then Lien wanted to have a recount, not just partial recount of the ballots from those polling stations that might have had "problems," but an overall recount.
The Taiwan High Court accepted the case, ordered all ballots to be sealed, was ready to examine the charges and go forward for a recount, even a total recount, if it was deemed it necessary after the hearings.
But because of a procedural error made by Lien, the court yesterday decided to throw out his case. Lien will have to decide whether to refile the lawsuit or seek another option.
But even before the court ruling, the demand of the pan-blues had become an administrative recount by the CEC, to bypass the possibly lengthy court-ordered recount process.
However, the law governing the presidential election does not provide the commission with such power and therefore a revision to the law is required to state specifically that the revision will apply to the already concluded election.
Chen agreed to such a measure on Tuesday and ordered the DPP legislative caucus to initiate such a proposal.
Since the sealed ballots have been in the custody of the court since Lien filed his case, he must withdraw his case so that the sealed ballots can be returned to the CEC for an administrative recount after the revision of the electoral law. This is a required due process.
To the amazement of the country, Lien rejected the proposal and ordered the KMT legislative caucus to boycott the proposal to revise the law. Lien then wanted Chen to declare a national emergency so that a recount could be done without a court ruling and other legal and legislative process.
People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) even issued an ultimatum demanding a meeting with Chen within 24 hours and a recount to begin in 48 hours.
The numerous shifts of Lien's demands make people suspect whether a fair and transparent legal procedure would satisfy him.
In an interview given to a prominent member of the international media, Lien went so far as to claim that "he would have difficulties in accepting the ruling of the court."
In another interview, he said that he would accept the result of the recount but he demanded a fresh election anyway. He also said that he could not control the crowd he brought to the Presidential Office square any more.
Meanwhile, an even larger demonstration has been planned by Lien for this Saturday. One PFP lawmaker proclaimed that the pan-blue side is staging a revolution and therefore it did not care about the laws of the land.
In the last few days, the most radical pan-blue politicians have taken the stage upon a sound truck in front of the Presidential Office building to make all kinds of outrageous but unsubstantiated allegations against Chen.
The pan-blue camp's actions, particularly through rounds of international press conferences, have confused the international community about the presidential election.
In turn, the pan-blue camp cites the lack of a congratulatory message from Washington to Chen as evidence that it has full backing from the US and the president's election is illegitimate, contrary to the fact that the CEC has made its official announcement in accordance with the law.
Taiwan had some problems after the 2000 presidential election when a blue-camp crowd blamed Soong's defeat on former president Lee Teng-hui (
For any young democracy to sustain and to flourish over time, the political elite's acceptance and their complete respect for the result of an election's results is the most fundamental rule of the game. A democracy should be run by the rule of law and political activities should be conducted through the due process of law, not overrun by demagogy and inflammatory but unsubstantiated allegations.
The loser in the election should learn how to bow out gracefully rather than turn sour.
Joseph Wu is deputy secretary-general to the president.
A few weeks ago in Kaohsiung, tech mogul turned political pundit Robert Tsao (曹興誠) joined Western Washington University professor Chen Shih-fen (陳時奮) for a public forum in support of Taiwan’s recall campaign. Kaohsiung, already the most Taiwanese independence-minded city in Taiwan, was not in need of a recall. So Chen took a different approach: He made the case that unification with China would be too expensive to work. The argument was unusual. Most of the time, we hear that Taiwan should remain free out of respect for democracy and self-determination, but cost? That is not part of the usual script, and
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) held a news conference to celebrate his party’s success in surviving Saturday’s mass recall vote, shortly after the final results were confirmed. While the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) would have much preferred a different result, it was not a defeat for the DPP in the same sense that it was a victory for the KMT: Only KMT legislators were facing recalls. That alone should have given Chu cause to reflect, acknowledge any fault, or perhaps even consider apologizing to his party and the nation. However, based on his speech, Chu showed
For nearly eight decades, Taiwan has provided a home for, and shielded and nurtured, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). After losing the Chinese Civil War in 1949, the KMT fled to Taiwan, bringing with it hundreds of thousands of soldiers, along with people who would go on to become public servants and educators. The party settled and prospered in Taiwan, and it developed and governed the nation. Taiwan gave the party a second chance. It was Taiwanese who rebuilt order from the ruins of war, through their own sweat and tears. It was Taiwanese who joined forces with democratic activists
RSS