After drastic swings and sways, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) defeated the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and People First Party (PFP) by a tiny margin in the election, as predicted. This hard-fought election has continued down a tortuous road for the following reasons:
First, backed up by their majority of seats in the Legislative Yuan, the KMT and PFP have often deterred policies from being implemented, created commotion and thus misled the public by painting the administration as incompetent.
Second, since the DPP is in power for the first time, its administrative performance, of course, cannot meet all expectations. Some complaints are inevitable. Besides, the corruption of individual DPP politicians may arouse discontent and mistrust.
Third, biased media influence people's opinions and obstruct grassroots identification with the government. Some sharp-tongued commentators even take delight in instigating crowds and fomenting a rebellion.
Fourth, China plays all kinds of tricks to provoke ethnic conflicts and to scheme confrontations between the government and its people. For instance, China refuses to negotiate with the Straits Exchange Foundation, plotted the "Taiwan Spy" incident, impeded the return of China-based Taiwanese businesspeople to vote and insidiously supports white-collar fugitive Chen Yu-hao's (
Fifth, China uses its diplomatic advantages to exaggerate facts or even make up a story. Beijing's diplomatic maneuver strains Taiwan's international relations and damages its reputation.
Nevertheless, it is the DPP that harvests the triumph of this election. The DPP's victory demonstrates that it is correct to use "one country on each side" as the campaign axis to resist the "one China" principle. This explains the people's grave concern for Tai-wan's sovereignty and national dignity which can not be replaced by any economic gains. In particular, former president Lee Teng-hui's (
Instead of creating social and political upheaval, the assassination attempt on the president left him and and vice president with just slight injuries. This is a blessing for Taiwan. The contention over whether the assassination attempt drew more votes to the DPP's side only has a small impact on the election. It was independent Legislator Sisy Chen's (
Unfortunately, seeing his presidential dream go up in smoke, KMT Chairman Lien Chan (
The DPP must also strive to ease the political fever from the campaign. It needs to soothe the seething resentment of the opposition party. Lien and Soong, however, should take take their defeat with calm rationalism. They must not instigate the public and create chaos to give China an excuse to invade Taiwan.
Lien and Soong have madly staked their political career on one last call. Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (
Paul Lin is a political commentator based in New York.
Taiwan aims to elevate its strategic position in supply chains by becoming an artificial intelligence (AI) hub for Nvidia Corp, providing everything from advanced chips and components to servers, in an attempt to edge out its closest rival in the region, South Korea. Taiwan’s importance in the AI ecosystem was clearly reflected in three major announcements Nvidia made during this year’s Computex trade show in Taipei. First, the US company’s number of partners in Taiwan would surge to 122 this year, from 34 last year, according to a slide shown during CEO Jensen Huang’s (黃仁勳) keynote speech on Monday last week.
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
When China passed its “Anti-Secession” Law in 2005, much of the democratic world saw it as yet another sign of Beijing’s authoritarianism, its contempt for international law and its aggressive posture toward Taiwan. Rightly so — on the surface. However, this move, often dismissed as a uniquely Chinese form of legal intimidation, echoes a legal and historical precedent rooted not in authoritarian tradition, but in US constitutional history. The Chinese “Anti-Secession” Law, a domestic statute threatening the use of force should Taiwan formally declare independence, is widely interpreted as an emblem of the Chinese Communist Party’s disregard for international norms. Critics
RSS