My heart sank when television broadcasts showed Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (連戰) leading the ballot count, one hour after voting closed. When it later emerged that President Chen Shui-bian (
While I could empathize with Lien's resentment at having lost a second presidential election, I was dismayed at his declaration that the election was unfair and should be nullified.
Time indeed is no longer on the side of Lien and People First Party Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜), who will be 72 and 66-years-old, respectively, in 2008. But I am perplexed that in their desire to assume the presi-dency, they have no reservations in casting a doubt over the democracy and integrity of the governmental organizations in Taiwan.
The entire world is sitting up and looking at the statements made by Lien and Soong. Is this how they display their so-called love for Taiwan?
Regardless of whether the pan-blue camp lost by 30,000 votes or 1 vote, the fact remains that they should respect the wishes of the majority of the voters. It should not matter even if some voters chose to vote for the pan-green camp as a result of the assassination attempt. In a democracy, every one should be respected for their choice of vote, regardless of the reason or factor.
The post-election actions of Lien and Soong would definitely have proven that both men are not suitable for the presidency. Instead of being magnanimous and gracefully accepting the fact that they are still not the choice of the majority of voters, both chose to adopt the behavior of a sore loser, out to create chaos for the country. It is ironical that Lien and Soong have called for their supporters to remain calm when it is clearly evident that their speech and actions are tailored to incite their supporters to create chaos and social unrest.
US vice president Al Gore was denied his legitimate victory in the 2000 election, even though he won the popular vote. But in Lien's case, it was clear he lost the popular vote. Yet he still shamelessly refuse to concede defeat.
The Taiwanese people have been fortunate not to have elected a man of such character to lead the nation.
Congratulations to Chen, the DPP and Taiwan in general -- a good man has indeed been elected. Sadly, the celebrations have been marred by two sore losers.
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS