The Taiwan referendum observation mission of the Initiative and Referendum Institute Europe observed the first nationwide referendum in Taiwan yesterday. We have noted the legal failure of the two referendum questions, as they did not reached the turnout requirement of 50 percent of the electorate.
However, we understand that this is not the end of the history of referendums in Taiwan, but the beginning, as there are at least three essential lessons to be learnt from the country's first practical experience of referendums.
First, abolish the 50 percent turnout quorum for referen-dums. By having a turnout quorum of 50 percent the free and fair democratic process is decisively disturbed. Such a threshold does produce a motivation for boycott strategies and does not enhance the dialogue and learning process between citizens. In the end, "no" votes and people not voting make passing a proposal very difficult. It is our strong recommendation, based on worldwide experience, to abolish the 50 percent turnout quorum in the Referendum Law as soon as possible.
Second, promote offensive instead of defensive referendums. President Chen Shui-bian (
This so-called "defensive referendum" became a victim of bipartisan competition, as the referendums took place on the same day as the presidential election. In order to promote the constructive elements of direct democracy, IRI Europe strongly recommends using "offensive" referendums on separate voting days in future.
With "offensive" referendums we mean popular initiatives by the people of Taiwan and mandatory referendums on constitutional matters, as proposed by the opposition presidential candidate, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (
Third, secure the secrecy of the vote in referendums We have observed the conduct of yesterday's referendum with great concern. We visited several voting stations in Tainan and could see how people had to show in public if they were taking part in the referendum or not, after taking part in the election.
This is interfering with the principle of secrecy in democratic elections and referendums and should be avoided in future.
The problem could be solved by not combining an election with a referendum, as well as abolishing the 50-percent turnout requirement. But even if these requirements are upheld, it is possible to secure voting secrecy by not separating the voting procedure.
We must express our tremendous appreciation for the maturity and accuracy of yesterday's election and referendum. After the assassination attempt on Chen, the Taiwanese people stayed calm and demonstrated to the whole world that this is a free and democratic country. A country which should be assisted in all its efforts to further deepen and strengthen democracy.
Bruno Kaufmann is president of the Initiative and Referendum Institute Europe.
The article was first printed in the Asia Times Online and is republished with permission, since Asia Times Online published it on the 21st.
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
RSS