The Taiwan referendum observation mission of the Initiative and Referendum Institute Europe observed the first nationwide referendum in Taiwan yesterday. We have noted the legal failure of the two referendum questions, as they did not reached the turnout requirement of 50 percent of the electorate.
However, we understand that this is not the end of the history of referendums in Taiwan, but the beginning, as there are at least three essential lessons to be learnt from the country's first practical experience of referendums.
First, abolish the 50 percent turnout quorum for referen-dums. By having a turnout quorum of 50 percent the free and fair democratic process is decisively disturbed. Such a threshold does produce a motivation for boycott strategies and does not enhance the dialogue and learning process between citizens. In the end, "no" votes and people not voting make passing a proposal very difficult. It is our strong recommendation, based on worldwide experience, to abolish the 50 percent turnout quorum in the Referendum Law as soon as possible.
Second, promote offensive instead of defensive referendums. President Chen Shui-bian (
This so-called "defensive referendum" became a victim of bipartisan competition, as the referendums took place on the same day as the presidential election. In order to promote the constructive elements of direct democracy, IRI Europe strongly recommends using "offensive" referendums on separate voting days in future.
With "offensive" referendums we mean popular initiatives by the people of Taiwan and mandatory referendums on constitutional matters, as proposed by the opposition presidential candidate, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (
Third, secure the secrecy of the vote in referendums We have observed the conduct of yesterday's referendum with great concern. We visited several voting stations in Tainan and could see how people had to show in public if they were taking part in the referendum or not, after taking part in the election.
This is interfering with the principle of secrecy in democratic elections and referendums and should be avoided in future.
The problem could be solved by not combining an election with a referendum, as well as abolishing the 50-percent turnout requirement. But even if these requirements are upheld, it is possible to secure voting secrecy by not separating the voting procedure.
We must express our tremendous appreciation for the maturity and accuracy of yesterday's election and referendum. After the assassination attempt on Chen, the Taiwanese people stayed calm and demonstrated to the whole world that this is a free and democratic country. A country which should be assisted in all its efforts to further deepen and strengthen democracy.
Bruno Kaufmann is president of the Initiative and Referendum Institute Europe.
The article was first printed in the Asia Times Online and is republished with permission, since Asia Times Online published it on the 21st.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS