The past few days have seen so many bewildering and inexplicable events relating to the presidential campaign that one despairs of making head or tail of it. But more than any other, there is one question which sticks in the mind. Why must the pan-blue alliance continually obfuscate the truth?
As if it weren't bad enough to run five full-page ads in Chinese-language newspapers equating President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) with Adolf Hitler, People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) then proved his utter contemptibility in a statement on Friday regarding the Central Election Commission's decision to count misplaced presidential ballots.
"If Chen insists on counting ballots placed in the wrong ballot boxes as valid, then he is acting just like that dictator, Hitler," he declared.
Such a patently absurd claim deserves to be heaped with ridicule. Comparing the Chen administration to the Nazi regime is, at best, a total misrepresentation of historical fact or, at worst, malicious and offensive libel.
The pan-blues have once again proven their compulsive hypocrisy and craven amorality.
You needn't be exceedingly familiar with the history of Taiwan to judge which political party's past most closely resembles the genocidal violence and fascist oppression of Hitler's National Socialist Party.
The murder, torture and persecution of political dissidents and minority ethnic groups by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) under Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) are matters of record. The use of assassination, the employment of brutal thugs to assault opposition members, the repression of free speech, the quashing of political dissent, the use of torture, sham trials and summary executions are all characteristics of the KMT during the White Terror.
It would be irresponsible and unethical to claim that the modern KMT still employs such tactics. But surely its shift toward a more benign style of politics is a result of the efforts of people such as Chen -- a longtime democracy activist, former human-rights lawyer and victim of KMT oppression -- to make the government accountable to the people.
During last Saturday's 313 Rally, Soong fell to his knees in Taichung and kissed the ground to "show his love for Taiwan." Not to be outdone, Lien later prostrated himself before the Presidential Office and kissed the ground as well. How these gestures will be interpreted by the electorate is not clear, but it is clear that Lien and Soong will do anything, even abase themselves in public, to gain power.
Lately, the pan-blue camp has been running a series of TV advertisements in which it has attempted to equate Lien with former US president Franklin Delano Roosevelt and former UK prime minister Winston Churchill. But it seems that when the alliance was studying up on these leaders, there was an error in translation.
Roosevelt said: "We, and all others who believe in freedom as deeply as we do, would rather die on our feet than live on our knees." Apparently the pan-blues have translated this as, "It is better to win on your knees than lose on your feet."
The pan-blues should be ashamed of adopting such cheap, indefensible theatrics. It would be easier to respect the policies and leadership of the KMT and the PFP were they to refrain from making such spurious and feckless declarations. But it is too much to expect the pan-blues to use truth in their campaign.
For were they to tell the truth about their shadowy financial dealings, their connections to the underworld, their corruption, their pandering to Beijing and their subordination of Taiwan's welfare in their quest to quench their thirst for power, no one would vote for them.
Mac William Bishop is a political commentator based in Taipei.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS