In teaching, less is more
Julie Barff ("English teaching: Check the theory," March 8, page 8) has some harsh words for Chen Shu-chin (
Without joining in the name-calling, let me briefly point out that Barff has not represented my work correctly: Contrary to Barff's statement, I do not maintain that language acquisition ability declines after age six (although some scholars do).
As for the issue of early English, I agree with Chen Shu-Chin: Starting English too early and emphasizing "English-only" education for very young children can crowd out other valuable learning experiences.
But there is another very good reason to reduce emphasis on English in the very early years. Starting later and doing less is actually more efficient for acquiring English: Studies consistently show that older children are significantly faster than younger children in second language acquisition.
In addition, a solid foundation in the first language makes a strong contribution to second language development: Those who are more literate in their first language acquire literacy in the second language more quickly, and those who know more, thanks to a good education in their first language, understand more of what they read and hear in their second language, which speeds acquisition. Ironically, "less is more" in this situation.
Starting English later and devoting more time to developing a strong foundation in Chinese will actually promote English language development. It will also ensure quality education for Taiwanese children and the development of the first language.
It is a win-win situation. Premature and excessive English is lose-lose, bad for both English and academic development.
An important additional point: In situations in which English is crucial for daily life, as in the US, non-English speaking children should begin English as a second language (ESL) classes the first day they enter school.
But the most effective programs also include a great deal of education in the child's primary language.
Research shows that these programs teach English at least as well, and usually better than, all-day English programs.
Barff is correct in her reporting of the results of Canadian French immersion: It is true that these programs produce very good results, and in the original version, early total immersion, instruction is primarily in the second language in the early years.
Research over the last three decades, however, has shown us that there are more efficient models.
In fact, studies show that given an equal number of hours of exposure, children who begin immersion programs later make more progress than those who begin younger, confirming that older children acquire faster.
In my view the research supports the desirability of a strong foundation in the primary language for all students.
I also agree with Barff that our attention should be directed at whether our ESL classes are as effective as they could be.
Use of the most efficient methods (which also happen to be the most pleasant), combined with wide recreational reading in English, will easily produce adequate levels of English-language competence, without starting too early and without crowding other important subjects out of the curriculum. The problem is not lack of time devoted to English, it is methodology and a failure to encourage wide reading.
I presented a paper on this topic, Dealing with English Fever, at the International Symposium sponsored by the English Teachers' Association/ROC last November in Taipei. It can be found on my Web site, www.sdkrashen.com, and in the conference proceedings, published by the Crane Publishing Company in Taipei.
Stephen Krashen
Professor emeritus of
education, University of Southern California
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused