For most in the international audience, the hottest issue in the March 20 election lies largely in the impact the referendum will have on the triangular relationship between Taipei, Washington and Beijing. They must be confused,then, by the fact that it is a convicted fugitive, not the presidential candidates, who has been attracting most of the media attention in recent weeks.
Why is the Chinese-language media so preoccupied by former Tuntex Chen Yu-hao (
The Cabinet announced a NT$10 million reward for information leading to Chen Yu-hao's capture last year. He is wanted for embezzlement and fled Taiwan leaving outstanding bank debts amounting to several billion dollars. As is so often the case, the media have been happy to air his accusations without demanding he provide concrete proof of his stories first. He has an axe to grind with the administration and has chosen the most sensitive time to launch an offensive and the media has been happy to play along.
Politicians and officials often float trial balloons in the media or spread rumors to smear their rivals. Rarely do journalists in this country ask for proof; few appear to ask any hard questions. Politicians and others can state the most absurd statistics and never worry about being challenged. This kind of spectacle must make outsiders question the media circus that has developed since the lifting of martial law.
The public lives in a real world filled with hopes, fears, dreams and anxieties. But they are not very good at figuring out what to do about them. Sometimes the media plays the role of bringing the private pains and needs of real people to public attention. However, the media isn't very good at prioritizing the public's concerns or figuring out what to do about them, especially when it comes to the question of commercial interests.
So they go for the easy stories. Most local media seemed to have no choice but to dance to Chen Yu-hao's tune. He initially faxed three letters to some pan-blue camp legislators and followed them up with newspaper and radio interviews. He promised details and facts -- but they were always to be delivered later. Because of the biased media culture that exists in this country, all parties related to the case fell into the typical cycle of political maneuvering. As a result, the credibility of the politicians and the media is even lower.
In its hubris, the media overestimates its power over the public. Reporters, call-in talk show hosts and people such as Chen Yu-hao think they can drive issues to the top of the list of the public's priorities. Yet, the evidence showed that it is often the public who decides on its priorities quite independently of the media.
Most people are quite clear about Chen Yu-hao's motives, regardless of what the media says. Ultimately, the public knows best . People have become suspicious of the media and increasingly sophisticated in recognizing its attempts at manipulation. The public now sees the media as a kind of special-interest group, no more objective than or independent of any other social groups in presenting its view. The wisdom of the Taiwanese people should not be underestimated.
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS