Politicians change their stances with the same ease as they flip the pages of a book. This is as true today as it was in the past. Only a few months ago, French President Jacques Chirac raised the moral banner high as he took the lead in criticizing a US-led war in Iraq. Chirac never forgot to mention "principles" and to pose as a savior of small nations the world over. Now he wears a different face as Chinese President Hu Jintao (
The Chirac administration has also proposed the EU lift its arms embargo against China. Fortunately, however, the proposal was rejected by many other EU nations. People familiar with Franco-Taiwan relations were not surprised by Chirac's actions, since he has always been a good friend of China. Franco-Taiwan relations have not improved since he came to power. For three years in a row, France spoke against a proposal aimed at allowing Taiwan to participate in the UN. It has also repeatedly opposed Taiwan's participation in the World Health Organization. The purpose of such actions can only be to echo China's stance on Taiwan.
Chirac's remarks on the March 20 referendum verge on cruelty and are tantamount to supporting a belligerent China pointing its missiles at small Taiwan. He also wants to sell weapons to China so that the thugs in the Zhongnanhai may use them to deal with dissent. Chirac's China policy is a textbook case of a politician's naked hypocrisy.
No wonder Chen pointed out candidly during a TV interview on Tuesday night that Chirac's remarks reveal his ignorance of democracy, and that such remarks harm France, not him.
Indeed, Chirac's remarks have lowered the status of France, a country steeped in the traditions of freedom, democracy and human rights, to the same level as China's.
France is too far away from Asia, both geographically and culturally. Taiwan is a small country that can hardly satisfy France's needs in terms of business interests. Naturally, it will be difficult to expect France to sympathize with and be friendly to Taiwan. However, people do expect France, as a democratic nation, to have some sympathy for Taiwan's democratization process -- at least to refrain from openly opposing it. Apparently, even this small expectation has come to naught.
This reminds one of a scene just before the World Health Assembly in Geneva last year -- a French-speaking official from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs gleefully explaining to reporters that, despite speaking against Taiwan's participation in the WHO, France was not really opposing Taiwan's participation but was simply of the opinion that the two sides of the Taiwan Strait should gain a consensus on the issue before anything could happen.
The sight of a Taiwanese diplomat defending a France that had snubbed his own country goes a long way toward explaining the unrealistic expectations Taiwan has placed on the Chirac administration.
We can only hope that the people of a country that embraces the values of freedom, democracy and human rights will continue to stand firm on their principles. The future prospects for Franco-Taiwan relations depend as much on France's determination to defend these values as on Taiwan's admiration for these deep and vast French traditions.
As Ukraine leads the global fight for democracy, Taiwan, facing a potential war with China, should draw lessons from Ukraine’s cyberwarfare success. Taiwan has been enhancing its arsenal with advanced weapons from the West in anticipation of a possible full-scale invasion. However, Taipei should also consider Ukraine’s effective digital warfare, notably the “IT [information technology] Army,” a decentralized force instrumental in Kyiv’s cybercampaigns. In February 2022, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine marked the onset of a significant cyberwar, where fears of a “digital Pearl Harbor” in Ukraine were unmet, thanks to robust cyberdefenses backed by Western public and private support. This led
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is attempting to create an alternative international world order to the US-dominated model. China has benefited hugely from the current order since former Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平) opened up its economy five decades ago. Countries can be categorized as continental or maritime, and to a great degree this determines their optimum foreign policy. China is continental, as is Russia. The US initially followed a continental foreign policy, before it settled on a maritime model. The British empire was so successful because a tiny island kingdom built a formidable naval presence. The US-dominated world order, stabilized by
“You are Taiwanese? Do you speak Taiwanese then?” Growing up in Buenos Aires, my school memories were filled with Spanish, a language that dances off the tongue with the same rhythm and elegance as the tango. However, in my house, a different melody would play — one that alluded to my roots, an artisanal, homemade combination of Taiwanese Hokkien and Mandarin. Although it was a beautiful sound, it was not a tempo I could follow. Put simply, the Taiwanese language was too hard for me to grasp. Eventually, my parents gave into my requests and abandoned that unique fusion of Chinese and
On April 24, US President Joe Biden signed the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act. The law, which was overwhelmingly approved by the US Congress, requires the popular video-sharing app TikTok to divest from its parent company, China-based ByteDance, or face a ban in the US. The legislation highlights a dilemma faced by democratic countries, including Taiwan, that pits free speech against national security interests. The US ultimatum is meant to address national security concerns that, according to China’s National Security Law and National Intelligence Law, obligates Chinese individuals and organizations to support national intelligence work, allowing the