The H5N1 avian flu strain that has shocked the World Health Organization (WHO) first appeared in Hong Kong in 1997. This year the virus seems to have become more virulent as it spreads across Asia. Currently, poultry farms in Japan, South Korea, Vietnam, Thailand, Indonesia, Cambodia and Pakistan have been affected. Tens of millions of chickens have been culled. The speed of the contagion is unprecedented and its impact on Asia's poultry farmers cannot be ignored.
What is especially worrisome is that six people reportedly died in Vietnam from bird flu, raising concerns throughout the region and at the WHO. According to epidemiologists, the wide scope of the contagion, the inter-species transmission and the successive transmission to one poultry farm after another have been some of the unusual features of this outbreak. The speed of transmission appears to have taken the WHO by surprise.
In Taiwan, outbreaks have been reported in some poultry farms in the center and south of the country. This has resulted in the slaughter of around 200,000 chickens. According to test results, however, the outbreaks were not caused by the virulent H5N1 strain of avian flu. But as happened with last year's SARS epidemic, no WHO officials have come here yet to offer assistance in epidemic prevention. Such a repeat is deplorable.
Can other countries really afford for Taiwan to become a loophole in efforts to stop the spread of bird flu?
The WHO, which is responsible for ensuring humanity's health, continues to kowtow to Chinese political pressure and reject Taiwan's participation.
China has repeatedly lied to the world, saying that Beijing can take care of the Taiwanese people's health needs. In reality, however, China has spread diseases to Taiwan -- from the foot-and-mouth epidemic a few years ago to SARS. Those outbreaks showed the world the deficiencies of the Chinese health-care system and its bureaucracy. How can China take care of Taiwan if it cannot even take good care of its own people?
Everyone knows that rapid disease control is very important when contagious diseases like SARS and bird flu break out. Think about it. Tens of thousands of people travel in and out of Taiwan every day. Once a new disease appears in Taiwan, it could spread to other parts of the world in a couple of days. If Taiwan remains unable to get timely global epidemic information or link itself to the international epidemic-prevention network, then we won't have to think hard to see what price the international community may have to pay for leaving a loophole open in Taiwan.
We are happy to see the Thai government quickly invite experts from other Asian countries, including Taiwan, to an epidemic-prevention conference. This reflects the growing awareness among Asian countries that only when truly united can they effectively prevent further spread of the outbreak. Thailand knows that Taiwan must not be allowed to become a loophole in the prevention work. What legitimate reason can other WHO members still cite to exclude this nation from that organization?
Taiwan aims to elevate its strategic position in supply chains by becoming an artificial intelligence (AI) hub for Nvidia Corp, providing everything from advanced chips and components to servers, in an attempt to edge out its closest rival in the region, South Korea. Taiwan’s importance in the AI ecosystem was clearly reflected in three major announcements Nvidia made during this year’s Computex trade show in Taipei. First, the US company’s number of partners in Taiwan would surge to 122 this year, from 34 last year, according to a slide shown during CEO Jensen Huang’s (黃仁勳) keynote speech on Monday last week.
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
When China passed its “Anti-Secession” Law in 2005, much of the democratic world saw it as yet another sign of Beijing’s authoritarianism, its contempt for international law and its aggressive posture toward Taiwan. Rightly so — on the surface. However, this move, often dismissed as a uniquely Chinese form of legal intimidation, echoes a legal and historical precedent rooted not in authoritarian tradition, but in US constitutional history. The Chinese “Anti-Secession” Law, a domestic statute threatening the use of force should Taiwan formally declare independence, is widely interpreted as an emblem of the Chinese Communist Party’s disregard for international norms. Critics
RSS