The H5N1 avian flu strain that has shocked the World Health Organization (WHO) first appeared in Hong Kong in 1997. This year the virus seems to have become more virulent as it spreads across Asia. Currently, poultry farms in Japan, South Korea, Vietnam, Thailand, Indonesia, Cambodia and Pakistan have been affected. Tens of millions of chickens have been culled. The speed of the contagion is unprecedented and its impact on Asia's poultry farmers cannot be ignored.
What is especially worrisome is that six people reportedly died in Vietnam from bird flu, raising concerns throughout the region and at the WHO. According to epidemiologists, the wide scope of the contagion, the inter-species transmission and the successive transmission to one poultry farm after another have been some of the unusual features of this outbreak. The speed of transmission appears to have taken the WHO by surprise.
In Taiwan, outbreaks have been reported in some poultry farms in the center and south of the country. This has resulted in the slaughter of around 200,000 chickens. According to test results, however, the outbreaks were not caused by the virulent H5N1 strain of avian flu. But as happened with last year's SARS epidemic, no WHO officials have come here yet to offer assistance in epidemic prevention. Such a repeat is deplorable.
Can other countries really afford for Taiwan to become a loophole in efforts to stop the spread of bird flu?
The WHO, which is responsible for ensuring humanity's health, continues to kowtow to Chinese political pressure and reject Taiwan's participation.
China has repeatedly lied to the world, saying that Beijing can take care of the Taiwanese people's health needs. In reality, however, China has spread diseases to Taiwan -- from the foot-and-mouth epidemic a few years ago to SARS. Those outbreaks showed the world the deficiencies of the Chinese health-care system and its bureaucracy. How can China take care of Taiwan if it cannot even take good care of its own people?
Everyone knows that rapid disease control is very important when contagious diseases like SARS and bird flu break out. Think about it. Tens of thousands of people travel in and out of Taiwan every day. Once a new disease appears in Taiwan, it could spread to other parts of the world in a couple of days. If Taiwan remains unable to get timely global epidemic information or link itself to the international epidemic-prevention network, then we won't have to think hard to see what price the international community may have to pay for leaving a loophole open in Taiwan.
We are happy to see the Thai government quickly invite experts from other Asian countries, including Taiwan, to an epidemic-prevention conference. This reflects the growing awareness among Asian countries that only when truly united can they effectively prevent further spread of the outbreak. Thailand knows that Taiwan must not be allowed to become a loophole in the prevention work. What legitimate reason can other WHO members still cite to exclude this nation from that organization?
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
RSS