Missile crisis worse than Cuba
Your editorial ("Allies need to show some spine," Jan. 1, page 8) offers good advice to allies on how to deal with the referendum on China's missiles. As the Taiwanese expression goes, China is "an assailant calling for assistance" from Taiwan's allies.
Taiwan is under constant threat from China's ballistic missiles, which can reach their targets in seven minutes.
This situation is much graver than the Cuban missile crisis.
If US President John F. Kennedy could ask Russia to dismantle its Cuban-based missiles, why can't President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) have a defensive referendum to ask China to dismantle theirs?
This referendum can prevent the missiles from altering the status quo.
If Taiwan's allies discourage this peaceful and democratic referendum from taking place, China will get the wrong impression and deploy more missiles, even targeting Japan and probably the west coast of the US.
Japan therefore should ask the UN to sponsor a plebiscite in Taiwan based on the principle of self-determination. In addition, Japan should support Taiwan's defensive referendum because this will stabilize the entire Asia-Pacific region, including Japan.
Taiwan will be happy to cancel its defensive referendum on March 20 if China dismantles its missiles, just like Libya is voluntarily dismantling its program for weapons of mass destruction.
The US, Japan and the EU should ask China, through a UN resolution, to renounce the use of force against Taiwan.
Charles Hong
Columbus, Ohio
US deaths on Chen's head
I have read many articles and editorials recently supporting President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) move to hold a so-called "defensive referendum" in March, and also criticizing the Bush administration for publicly rebuking Chen, often stating that the matter is of no concern to the US.
The ignorance and arrogance of people like this astound me. While I support democracy in Taiwan, and while ideally the Taiwanese people have every right to decide on their future, this is not an ideal world.
It is US soldiers who will be sacrificing their lives to defend Taiwan in the event of an attack, and it is the US who has come to the defense of Taiwan in recent years when the Chinese threatened Taiwan with missile attacks. So this issue in every way affects, and should involve, the US. By being reckless and provocative, Chen is not only threatening the lives of many young Taiwanese soldiers who have no need to go to war, but also the lives of many young US soldiers. He has no right to do this.
If Chen can publicly state that he does not want or expect the US to defend Taiwan if the Chinese attack, then I say he can do whatever he pleases. But he can't seem to see the big picture, only whether he can get re-elected in March.
This isn't a game, and there are real people's lives at stake. Chen's recent actions and stubbornness show him to be an inexperienced and selfish person who cares more about his own power and connections than he does about the people of Taiwan. It's time for him to grow up and learn how to be a leader. Taiwan deserves much better than this.
David Evseeff
Taipei
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
RSS