"Wrongful incrimination," "slander," "smears," "conjuring things out of the blue," "shameless," "calling a deer a horse" and "distortion." A person accused of such deeds does sound rather objectionable. Yet these were the words used by the campaign headquarters of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the People First Party (PFP) in an advertisement criticizing President Chen Shui-bian (
It is language that would be considered by the average person to be excessive, not to mention the fact that it was directed at the head of state. If this does not constitute the crime of slandering the head of state, as spelled out in the Criminal Code, then what does?
On Saturday, the pan-blue campaign headquarters issued a copy of a speech by KMT Chairman Lien Chan (連戰). It contained the expression "kickback-taking president" (抽頭型總統), insinuating that Chen is corrupt. Lien did not actually use this in his speech, but local media still quoted it in their reports.
To defend Chen's reputation and counter the blue camp's accusation, first lady Wu Shu-chen (吳淑珍) yesterday went to the Taipei District Prosecutors' Office to file suit against Lien for libel and for using illegitimate means in the course of an election campaign.
Even though Lien did not use the words "kickback-taking president," his headquarters did distribute the handouts. Even if Lien can get away scot-free, the campaign office certainly should not. And even if the law cannot punish Lien, his crew cannot escape the damage their integrity has sustained.
As election day draws closer, both the pan-blue and pan-green camps are trying hard to distinguish themselves. Campaign language is also becoming more vitriolic as the race picks up its pace. The dignity befitting political figures and the style and propriety befitting democratic politics have all been overwhelmed by the desire for victory.
The language used by the pan-blue camp to criticize Chen could act as an apt description of the pan-blue camp as well. Chen's camp has also been indiscreet in its investigation and accusations regarding the Lien family's assets. The crude performances of both sides have dragged this election down to the level of a township representative brawl.
The election campaign has not officially begun, but attacks between the candidates and their parties, saturation media coverage and the over-engagement of the public have resulted in political and social schisms. Candidates should be debating their vision for the nation's future, but now the campaign has gone totally off track. Presidential candidates engage in groundless character assassination. And even if someone has the luck to escape from these killing fields, the winner will be left bereft of dignity. How can someone with so many wounds to his person be able to lead the country?
More and more people are hoping that election season will be over soon. Some are even organizing a group calling on voters to cast invalid votes. Repulsion over the election is spreading quickly. It is a warning sign that both camps should take note of.
It is hoped one of the presidential candidates can set an example by stepping forward and saying, "I would rather lose the election than lose our democracy. Let's end negative campaigning now."
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
For nearly eight decades, Taiwan has provided a home for, and shielded and nurtured, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). After losing the Chinese Civil War in 1949, the KMT fled to Taiwan, bringing with it hundreds of thousands of soldiers, along with people who would go on to become public servants and educators. The party settled and prospered in Taiwan, and it developed and governed the nation. Taiwan gave the party a second chance. It was Taiwanese who rebuilt order from the ruins of war, through their own sweat and tears. It was Taiwanese who joined forces with democratic activists
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) held a news conference to celebrate his party’s success in surviving Saturday’s mass recall vote, shortly after the final results were confirmed. While the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) would have much preferred a different result, it was not a defeat for the DPP in the same sense that it was a victory for the KMT: Only KMT legislators were facing recalls. That alone should have given Chu cause to reflect, acknowledge any fault, or perhaps even consider apologizing to his party and the nation. However, based on his speech, Chu showed
RSS