Chinese President Hu Jintao's (
Some Taiwanese media even interviewed these businesspeople. Such interviews helped Beijing manufacture favorable impressions of itself.
Taiwanese businesspeople in China do not have freedom of speech, so it is impossible for them to risk their fortunes and lives by criticizing the Chinese government. These business-
people have been claimed as bargaining chips by Beijing, which is eager to change the status quo in the Taiwan Strait and promote unification.
Four major points deserve to be made.
First, the reception was aimed at reducing the negative impact of China's major crackdown on an alleged Taiwanese spy ring. China made arrests that were aimed at helping the pan-blue camp against President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) in the presidential election campaign. Since some Taiwanese businesspeople have also been arrested, Hu arranged the reception in order to comfort the business community. Nevertheless, his guests may become victims of some other crackdown in the future. Those who have escaped through good luck this time still must be very careful.
Second, the reception was obviously a political act. Some Chinese academics have glorified it as "a separation of politics from economics." Such an opinion also exists in Taiwan. In fact, it was a step that was taken to accomplish political pacification from an economic angle, as well as to attract other Taiwanese businesspeople to invest. But Beijing clearly told them that they must stand by the the idea of unification. Taiwanese businesspeople should never become Beijing's bargaining chips.
Third, we have to realize the brutal ideas behind the new Chinese leaders' approach to "humanity and sympathy."
During Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao's (溫家寶) US visit, he talked about his nostalgia for Taiwan by citing a line from a famous poem by Yu Kuang-chung (余光中). Hu also cited the old Chinese saying, "Harmony in the family is the basis for any undertaking" (家和萬事興), when he talked about cross-strait relations.
Not long ago, some Chinese academics actually suggested that China "smash and rebuild Taiwan" (
Fourth, businesspeople in China need to have a strong sense of risk. Since China's policies change constantly, these business-
people have to prepare themselves for emergencies. Besides, China's nationalistic propaganda has long distorted the reality of Taiwan, misleading the Chinese people about the nation while creating the impression that China can bully Taiwan.
Businesspeople should be careful to not be attacked by both the Chinese government and its people.
On the eve of his US visit, in an interview with the Washington Post, Wen vowed that he would achieve unification at all costs.
This means that China will do whatever it takes to change the status quo.
The US should tell China's leaders to learn from Taiwan by giving up its one-party dictatorship and moving toward democracy.
The Communist Party of China is merely a political hoodlum if it remains unwilling to give up its privileged interests while pushing the people on either side of the Strait to a bloody war.
Paul Lin is a commentator based in New York.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS