Chinese President Hu Jintao's (
Some Taiwanese media even interviewed these businesspeople. Such interviews helped Beijing manufacture favorable impressions of itself.
Taiwanese businesspeople in China do not have freedom of speech, so it is impossible for them to risk their fortunes and lives by criticizing the Chinese government. These business-
people have been claimed as bargaining chips by Beijing, which is eager to change the status quo in the Taiwan Strait and promote unification.
Four major points deserve to be made.
First, the reception was aimed at reducing the negative impact of China's major crackdown on an alleged Taiwanese spy ring. China made arrests that were aimed at helping the pan-blue camp against President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) in the presidential election campaign. Since some Taiwanese businesspeople have also been arrested, Hu arranged the reception in order to comfort the business community. Nevertheless, his guests may become victims of some other crackdown in the future. Those who have escaped through good luck this time still must be very careful.
Second, the reception was obviously a political act. Some Chinese academics have glorified it as "a separation of politics from economics." Such an opinion also exists in Taiwan. In fact, it was a step that was taken to accomplish political pacification from an economic angle, as well as to attract other Taiwanese businesspeople to invest. But Beijing clearly told them that they must stand by the the idea of unification. Taiwanese businesspeople should never become Beijing's bargaining chips.
Third, we have to realize the brutal ideas behind the new Chinese leaders' approach to "humanity and sympathy."
During Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao's (溫家寶) US visit, he talked about his nostalgia for Taiwan by citing a line from a famous poem by Yu Kuang-chung (余光中). Hu also cited the old Chinese saying, "Harmony in the family is the basis for any undertaking" (家和萬事興), when he talked about cross-strait relations.
Not long ago, some Chinese academics actually suggested that China "smash and rebuild Taiwan" (
Fourth, businesspeople in China need to have a strong sense of risk. Since China's policies change constantly, these business-
people have to prepare themselves for emergencies. Besides, China's nationalistic propaganda has long distorted the reality of Taiwan, misleading the Chinese people about the nation while creating the impression that China can bully Taiwan.
Businesspeople should be careful to not be attacked by both the Chinese government and its people.
On the eve of his US visit, in an interview with the Washington Post, Wen vowed that he would achieve unification at all costs.
This means that China will do whatever it takes to change the status quo.
The US should tell China's leaders to learn from Taiwan by giving up its one-party dictatorship and moving toward democracy.
The Communist Party of China is merely a political hoodlum if it remains unwilling to give up its privileged interests while pushing the people on either side of the Strait to a bloody war.
Paul Lin is a commentator based in New York.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS