Chinese President Hu Jintao's (
Some Taiwanese media even interviewed these businesspeople. Such interviews helped Beijing manufacture favorable impressions of itself.
Taiwanese businesspeople in China do not have freedom of speech, so it is impossible for them to risk their fortunes and lives by criticizing the Chinese government. These business-
people have been claimed as bargaining chips by Beijing, which is eager to change the status quo in the Taiwan Strait and promote unification.
Four major points deserve to be made.
First, the reception was aimed at reducing the negative impact of China's major crackdown on an alleged Taiwanese spy ring. China made arrests that were aimed at helping the pan-blue camp against President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) in the presidential election campaign. Since some Taiwanese businesspeople have also been arrested, Hu arranged the reception in order to comfort the business community. Nevertheless, his guests may become victims of some other crackdown in the future. Those who have escaped through good luck this time still must be very careful.
Second, the reception was obviously a political act. Some Chinese academics have glorified it as "a separation of politics from economics." Such an opinion also exists in Taiwan. In fact, it was a step that was taken to accomplish political pacification from an economic angle, as well as to attract other Taiwanese businesspeople to invest. But Beijing clearly told them that they must stand by the the idea of unification. Taiwanese businesspeople should never become Beijing's bargaining chips.
Third, we have to realize the brutal ideas behind the new Chinese leaders' approach to "humanity and sympathy."
During Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao's (溫家寶) US visit, he talked about his nostalgia for Taiwan by citing a line from a famous poem by Yu Kuang-chung (余光中). Hu also cited the old Chinese saying, "Harmony in the family is the basis for any undertaking" (家和萬事興), when he talked about cross-strait relations.
Not long ago, some Chinese academics actually suggested that China "smash and rebuild Taiwan" (
Fourth, businesspeople in China need to have a strong sense of risk. Since China's policies change constantly, these business-
people have to prepare themselves for emergencies. Besides, China's nationalistic propaganda has long distorted the reality of Taiwan, misleading the Chinese people about the nation while creating the impression that China can bully Taiwan.
Businesspeople should be careful to not be attacked by both the Chinese government and its people.
On the eve of his US visit, in an interview with the Washington Post, Wen vowed that he would achieve unification at all costs.
This means that China will do whatever it takes to change the status quo.
The US should tell China's leaders to learn from Taiwan by giving up its one-party dictatorship and moving toward democracy.
The Communist Party of China is merely a political hoodlum if it remains unwilling to give up its privileged interests while pushing the people on either side of the Strait to a bloody war.
Paul Lin is a commentator based in New York.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Taiwan aims to elevate its strategic position in supply chains by becoming an artificial intelligence (AI) hub for Nvidia Corp, providing everything from advanced chips and components to servers, in an attempt to edge out its closest rival in the region, South Korea. Taiwan’s importance in the AI ecosystem was clearly reflected in three major announcements Nvidia made during this year’s Computex trade show in Taipei. First, the US company’s number of partners in Taiwan would surge to 122 this year, from 34 last year, according to a slide shown during CEO Jensen Huang’s (黃仁勳) keynote speech on Monday last week.
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
When China passed its “Anti-Secession” Law in 2005, much of the democratic world saw it as yet another sign of Beijing’s authoritarianism, its contempt for international law and its aggressive posture toward Taiwan. Rightly so — on the surface. However, this move, often dismissed as a uniquely Chinese form of legal intimidation, echoes a legal and historical precedent rooted not in authoritarian tradition, but in US constitutional history. The Chinese “Anti-Secession” Law, a domestic statute threatening the use of force should Taiwan formally declare independence, is widely interpreted as an emblem of the Chinese Communist Party’s disregard for international norms. Critics
RSS