Libya's complete renunciation of weapons of mass destruction and looming reacceptance by the US and Britain may be most important for the not-so-subtle message it sends to Iran and North Korea.
The surprise announcements on Friday last week by US President George W. Bush and British Prime Minister Tony Blair clearly signaled that Libya is on a fast track to rehabilitation after two decades on the Anglo-American blacklist.
Further, the leaders who spearheaded the ouster of the former Iraqi regime over its alleged pursuit of weapons of mass destruction implied that other so-called rogue states -- perhaps even their leaders -- could be redeemed.
"Old hostilities do not need to go on forever," Bush said.
"And I hope that other leaders will find an example in Libya's announcement today," he said.
Bush said that Libyan leader Colonel Muammar Qaddafi had initiated the rapprochement and "communicated to us his willingness to make a decisive change in the policy of his government."
Bush said that Libya now has an opportunity to regain its standing in the community of nations. Libya's good faith will be reciprocated, he added, stressing that Qaddafi's decision to foreswear illicit weapons makes the world "a safer place."
"When leaders make the wise and responsible choice, when they renounce terror and weapons of mass destruction, as Colonel Qaddafi has now done, they serve the interests of their own people and they add to the security of all nations," he said.
The president's personal remarks about the Libyan leader were a startling reversal from the 1980s, when Washington had portrayed Qaddafi as a madman atop the worldwide rogues gallery.
A 1986 US air raid in response to a terrorist blast that killed one US soldier in a Berlin disco targeted military sites in Tripoli and the coastal city of Benghazi. US aircraft even bombarded Qaddafi's private desert encampment.
Friday's revelations are the culmination of several years of Libyan toil to restore the country's position in the world. Qaddafi has reportedly mellowed with age and eventually became convinced that reconciliation with the West is a prerequisite for Libya's further development.
Years of private negotiations concluded this year when Tripoli struck a US$2.7 billion settlement with the families of 270 people killed in the 1988 bombing of Pan Am flight 103 over Lockerbie in Scotland. The US and Britain have since allowed the UN Security Council to lift international sanctions, imposed after the bombing of the airliner was linked to Libya.
In 1999, Qaddafi allowed two Libyan agents wanted in connection with the bombing to be deported to the Netherlands for trial by a special Scottish court. In 2001, Abdel Basset Ali al-Megrahi was convicted and sentenced to life in prison, while the second defendant was acquitted.
Even now, Tripoli remains under US economic sanctions over issues including the now-confirmed chemical and nuclear weapons components. Yet Libya had long fallen from the top of the list of Washington's pariahs.
The Sept. 11, 2001 attacks against New York and Washington aimed the crosshairs of US policy on terrorism. Calculating the worst-case scenario, the Bush administration soon expanded the "war on terrorism" to combating the proliferation of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons and the technologies to deliver them.
On Jan. 29 last year, Bush declared that terrorism and weapons of mass destruction forged "an axis of evil." Regimes with links to both threats embody that nexus, and he directly pointed the finger at three suspects: Iraq, Iran and North Korea.
Libya, no longer a big league villain, went unnamed.
Since then, the US, Britain and a coalition of allies fought a war to remove the Iraqi regime. Just last week, the former Baghdad strongman Saddam Hussein was finally captured in Iraq.
Meanwhile, the US government has kept diplomatic pressure on Iran and North Korea, and Bush named both in the same statement that welcomed Libya's progress.
"We've insisted on multilateral approaches, like that in North Korea, to confront threats. We're supporting the work of the International Atomic Energy Agency to hold the Iranian regime to its treaty obligations," he said.
These policies send an "unmistakable message" to regimes that seek or possess weapons of mass destruction, Bush said.
He added that leaders who followed Qaddafi's example and abandoned the pursuit of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons "will find an open path to better relations with the US and other free nations."
Libyan emissaries first contacted Bush and Blair nine months ago, coinciding with the launch of the invasion that toppled the Iraqi regime.
Just as the US and Britain were applying the stick of military might to Saddam, it has now emerged that Qaddafi chose to pursue the carrot of reconciliation.
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
RSS