The collapse of talks on the EU's first constitution leaves the bloc lurching toward a "big bang" enlargement next year with dysfunctional institutions in a mood of crisis and division.
Failure to agree at a weekend summit on a charter designed to ensure the EU can run efficiently after 10 new members join the existing 15 next May, means the Union's expansion beyond the old Iron Curtain is likely to be overshadowed by acrimony.
France and Germany, blocked in their bid for more voting power by Spain and Poland, responded by threatening to lead "pioneer groups" of like-minded countries towards closer integration, raising the prospect of a two-speed Europe.
ILLUSTRATION MOUNTAIN PEOPLE
"The first few years of enlargement are going to be a very rocky ride," said Heather Grabbe, deputy director of the Centre for European Reform.
"This was a time when the Union needed to be strong, but it will actually be divided and weak, concentrating on battles over money, jobs and power," she said.
Saturday's breakdown capped a year in which the EU split bitterly over the US-led war in Iraq, its budget rules were bent, Sweden voted against joining the euro and Britain decided not even to put the choice to its skeptical voters.
The defining moment of this year may well have been when French President Jacques Chirac chided the EU's east European newcomers in February for siding with the US over Iraq, saying they had "missed a good opportunity to shut up."
Diplomats said animosity and mutual distrust among leaders, who put their national interest above any sense of a common European goal, was a factor in the collapse of the constitution negotiations and augurs ill for next year's big challenges.
Two years' work on a constitution, drafted by a Convention of lawmakers and national representatives led by former French president Valery Giscard d'Estaing, ended in a deadlock that will tarnish the EU's image with its citizens and in the world.
The unresolved struggle over voting rights is bound to become entwined with a looming battle over the next EU budget and will overhang the appointment of a new European Commission and the election of a new European Parliament next year.
After failing to secure more voting power for the EU's most populous state, German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder said Germany wanted the ceiling on the 2007 to 2013 budget reduced to 1 percent of gross national income (GNI), from 1.27 percent at present.
Although the EU's current 100 billion euro annual budget only amounts to one percent of GNI, such a tight corset would leave no extra cash to meet the huge development needs of the less wealthy new member states.
The EU was always likely to face strains digesting 10 new countries that will swell its population from 375 to 450 million and most leaders chose to play down the severity of the crisis they had unleashed on Saturday.
Britain said life would go on and the EU would simply apply the 2000 Nice treaty, which gave Spain and Poland almost as many votes as Germany, with twice their population.
But most experts doubt whether that rulebook, so complex and flawed that EU leaders sought to rewrite it almost before the ink was dry, can keep an enlarged Union moving forward.
"This EU of 25 or 27 cannot really work with the Treaty of Nice," said Daniel Gros, director of the Center for European Policy Studies in Brussels.
Chirac said "pioneer groups" could move ahead in the fields of economics, defense, crime-fighting and immigration, as they had done to launch the euro single currency and the Schengen border-free area within the EU.
Founders France, Germany, Belgium and Luxembourg are exploring joint initiatives with a core of like-minded states, diplomats say. But many analysts doubt how far this will lead.
"This core Europe stuff is a pipe dream," Gros said, arguing that Paris and Berlin had forfeited much trust as leaders of the European project after they trampled on EU budget rules last month to avoid disciplinary action for their excessive deficits.
The leaders set no date to resume constitution negotiations, leaving a cooling-off period likely to extend beyond a Spanish general election in March and European elections in June.
Schroeder and Chirac may hope the financial leverage of the budget talks will force Spain and Poland to sue for peace on voting rights by 2005, but in such a poisoned atmosphere, that seems far from certain.
On March 22, 2023, at the close of their meeting in Moscow, media microphones were allowed to record Chinese Communist Party (CCP) dictator Xi Jinping (習近平) telling Russia’s dictator Vladimir Putin, “Right now there are changes — the likes of which we haven’t seen for 100 years — and we are the ones driving these changes together.” Widely read as Xi’s oath to create a China-Russia-dominated world order, it can be considered a high point for the China-Russia-Iran-North Korea (CRINK) informal alliance, which also included the dictatorships of Venezuela and Cuba. China enables and assists Russia’s war against Ukraine and North Korea’s
After thousands of Taiwanese fans poured into the Tokyo Dome to cheer for Taiwan’s national team in the World Baseball Classic’s (WBC) Pool C games, an image of food and drink waste left at the stadium said to have been left by Taiwanese fans began spreading on social media. The image sparked wide debate, only later to be revealed as an artificially generated image. The image caption claimed that “Taiwanese left trash everywhere after watching the game in Tokyo Dome,” and said that one of the “three bad habits” of Taiwanese is littering. However, a reporter from a Japanese media outlet
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework