The Legislative Yuan has passed a Referendum Law (
Lin writes, "A defensive referendum is a strategic weapon of deterrence that absolutely must to be connected with the unification versus independence issue. Not connecting it this way would make it a bomb stripped of all explosives, a dud. It must not be rashly used, but it would be even more inappropriate to rashly strip it of all its explosive power."
From Lin to Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (
Taiwan's defensive referendum is definitely not about using destruction to deter China; rather, its purpose is to follow Article 17 in the Referendum Law which states that "when the nation is exposed to an external threat which threatens a change in national sovereignty, the president may, following a resolution by the Cabinet, place matters of national security before the public for decision in a national referendum."
In other words, the purpose is to let the public express its refusal to accept changes to the country's current independence and sovereignty. Such an expression of public opinion is appropriate at a time when China is using force to threaten to change the status quo of Taiwan's national sovereignty. It would also be appropriate if China threatened to change the status quo of Taiwan's sovereignty at a future negotiation.
The problem today is the question of whether the current threat is an "external threat" which "threatens a change in national sovereignty." The answer is "without a doubt." The reason why Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (
That one sentence divulges their true intentions. "Unity" means a change to Taiwan's current status as a sovereign country. "Will pay any price" is a serious threat. But Wen does not want war. I've said that neither Taiwan the the US nor China wants war, so how could there be a war? Lien's call on hundreds of thousands of mothers to write Chen to oppose war was just a repetition of the trick that he used during the 2000 presidential election to incite fear of war. He is trying to deceive both himself and others, and this attempt isn't even worth laughing at.
Wen's threats are obviously not aimed at Taiwan alone, but at the US too. He wants the US to help China threaten Taiwan, and so achieve his goal of changing Taiwan's current status as a sovereign country.
Will the US fall for China's tricks?
Of course not. The George W. Bush administration keeps clarifying its stance. It is clear and consistent, not in the least fuzzy. In particular, the White House official who wanted to remain anonymous during an interview with Hong Kong's Phoenix TV on Nov. 26 gave a thorough explanation of US policies under a barrage of journalists' questions. The core concept is that the US opposes any attempt by China or Taiwan to unilaterally change the status quo.
When journalists asked questions that compared "supporting Taiwan's democratic development" with "maintaining the status quo," the official unambiguously said that Taiwan's democratic mechanisms will continue to develop rapidly, that holding referendums is a legitimate way for democratic entities to implement democracy, and that there is no reason for anyone to assert that Taiwan does not have the right to a good, useful and modern constitution.
At the same time, he also unequivocally pointed out that over 80 percent of the people of Taiwan have said that they want to maintain the status quo, and said that he did not believe that democracy somehow would force Taiwan to change the status quo.
I think this White House official understands Taiwanese politics better than all the gentlemen in the pan-green and pan-blue camps, from Lin to Lien.
Since democracy will not force Taiwan to change the status quo, what force could force such a change? One such force is threats from China, external to Taiwan. Another such force is people in Taiwan not recognizing their own country's sovereignty, but instead recognizing the sovereignty of China over Taiwan. Once these two forces are joined together, the crucial moment when Taiwan will be forced to change its sovereignty will have arrived.
March 20 next year may be that crucial moment.
The defensive referendum will require that the Taiwanese people make an evaluation at that historical moment.
Either they will choose to identify with Taiwan and maintain Taiwan's current status as a sovereign and independent country, or they will choose to identify with China, leave Taiwan's sovereignty by the wayside and sign a comprehensive agreement with China to change Taiwan's status as a sovereign and independent country.
On March 20 next year, voters will therefore not merely elect a president, but also decide the direction of their country, the fate of Taiwan.
Ruan Ming is a visiting professor at Tamkang University and was a special assistant to Chinese Communist Party secretary-general Hu Yaobang (
Translated by Perry Svensson
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
Gogoro Inc was once a rising star and a would-be unicorn in the years prior to its debut on the NASDAQ in 2022, as its environmentally friendly technology and stylish design attracted local young people. The electric scooter and battery swapping services provider is bracing for a major personnel shakeup following the abrupt resignation on Friday of founding chairman Horace Luke (陸學森) as chief executive officer. Luke’s departure indicates that Gogoro is sinking into the trough of unicorn disillusionment, with the company grappling with poor financial performance amid a slowdown in demand at home and setbacks in overseas expansions. About 95