The results of this year's college entrance examinations were announced on Aug. 9. Although the average college enrollment is as high as 83.22 percent, more than half of the over 87,000 freshmen are forced to go to private schools. Apart from worrying about the high tuition fees every semester, their lives may also become very different.
The current system is classist. The same college-entrance examinations lead students into two worlds -- prestigious public schools versus expensive private ones.
This time, almost half of the 1,459 graduates from Taipei Municipal Chien Kuo Senior High School were admitted to National Taiwan University (NTU). Among these graduates, as many as 43 were admitted to the popular department of computer science and information engineering, which recruited 78 students this year. Compare that success rate to that of a high school in eastern Taiwan, which admitted two students.
In March, the Business Weekly (
Viewed from the perspective of social justice, the diversity of university admission is a very important concept, which means that all students from each race or social class have a chance to obtain the same level of higher education. This also has the function of promoting social mobility, apart from diversifying cultural impact on campuses. As for the government-funded public universities, they are especially responsible for providing more opportunities to students who come from different classes.
Unfortunately, due to the Ministry of Education's de-standardization of both elementary and junior-high textbooks, as well as the Diversified Enrollment Scheme, students in rural areas are at a disadvantage in this competition at present. It's also much easier for schools to select students with better social and economic backgrounds. The government's poor implementation of these policies has further worsened the problem.
On July 10, President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) commented that "tuition fees have never blocked social class mobility." But his comment stands only on the premise that children from those financially-disadvantaged families can be admitted to and afford to attend public universities.
It seemed much easier for them to do so in the past. But it's much harder now under the Diversified Enrollment Scheme, because poor students can hardly afford to go to various talent schools, English cram schools, or even study abroad. More importantly, since their parents are so busy making a living, they have no time to push their children to study. How can their kids catch up with other students under such circumstances?
How can we reverse this? How can we provide more opportunities to children from financially-disadvantaged households? These are the most important issues that deserve education reformers' full attention.
Chang Ruay-shiung is the dean of academic affairs at National Dong Hwa University.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS