The results of this year's college entrance examinations were announced on Aug. 9. Although the average college enrollment is as high as 83.22 percent, more than half of the over 87,000 freshmen are forced to go to private schools. Apart from worrying about the high tuition fees every semester, their lives may also become very different.
The current system is classist. The same college-entrance examinations lead students into two worlds -- prestigious public schools versus expensive private ones.
This time, almost half of the 1,459 graduates from Taipei Municipal Chien Kuo Senior High School were admitted to National Taiwan University (NTU). Among these graduates, as many as 43 were admitted to the popular department of computer science and information engineering, which recruited 78 students this year. Compare that success rate to that of a high school in eastern Taiwan, which admitted two students.
In March, the Business Weekly (
Viewed from the perspective of social justice, the diversity of university admission is a very important concept, which means that all students from each race or social class have a chance to obtain the same level of higher education. This also has the function of promoting social mobility, apart from diversifying cultural impact on campuses. As for the government-funded public universities, they are especially responsible for providing more opportunities to students who come from different classes.
Unfortunately, due to the Ministry of Education's de-standardization of both elementary and junior-high textbooks, as well as the Diversified Enrollment Scheme, students in rural areas are at a disadvantage in this competition at present. It's also much easier for schools to select students with better social and economic backgrounds. The government's poor implementation of these policies has further worsened the problem.
On July 10, President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) commented that "tuition fees have never blocked social class mobility." But his comment stands only on the premise that children from those financially-disadvantaged families can be admitted to and afford to attend public universities.
It seemed much easier for them to do so in the past. But it's much harder now under the Diversified Enrollment Scheme, because poor students can hardly afford to go to various talent schools, English cram schools, or even study abroad. More importantly, since their parents are so busy making a living, they have no time to push their children to study. How can their kids catch up with other students under such circumstances?
How can we reverse this? How can we provide more opportunities to children from financially-disadvantaged households? These are the most important issues that deserve education reformers' full attention.
Chang Ruay-shiung is the dean of academic affairs at National Dong Hwa University.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
If Taiwan falls, the true battle moves from the beaches into the concrete streets. Western analysts fixate on the invasion phase. They end wargames when missiles stop flying and submit policy papers after the fate of a beachhead is decided. This narrow focus ignores the grim reality of “the day after.” To address this blind spot, the Irregular Warfare Center (IWC) published a seminal study on March 5, 2026, titled China’s Way of Occupation: Implications for Taiwan. Authored by Jan K. Gleiman and others, the report analyzes Beijing’s actions in Tibet, Xinjiang (East Turkestan), and Hong Kong to expose a chilling playbook
Beijing has for decades insisted that Taiwan is a matter to be settled between China and the US — or, preferably, by China alone. The strategic environment around Taiwan is making that increasingly difficult. The clearest evidence this week came not from Washington or Beijing, but from Tokyo. Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi on Tuesday met with US President Donald Trump before his summit with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). Taiwan is expected to feature prominently in US-China talks, particularly as Beijing presses Washington over arms sales to Taipei. However, focusing only on what Trump might or might not concede misses the
On the surface, a radio interview with Democratic Progressive Party and Taipei mayoral candidate Puma Shen (沈伯洋) hosted by television producer Wang Wei-chung (王偉忠) on Sept. 10 came across as an old-time city resident putting questions to a candidate on the campaign trail. Beneath that, however, it was an encounter between two distinct Taiwanese experiences, two generations and two different political vocabularies. Wang grew up in a military dependents’ village. His parents came to Taiwan with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government, carrying with them the legacy of war, displacement, the loss of a homeland, and an identification with Chinese culture
Artificial intelligence (AI) is usually discussed as a technology story, but in Asia it has become a trade story, and nowhere is that more visible than in Taiwan. The nation has spent four decades mastering semiconductor manufacturing, and now finds itself at the center of the fastest redrawing of Asia’s trade map in a generation. What Taiwan does with that position, at home as much as abroad, would shape its economy for decades to come. The scale of the shift is striking. Intra-Asian trade in AI-enabling goods — the chips, components and equipment on which the technology runs — has roughly