Loving cleanliness
Rick Chu (
But I'm not sure if Chu has convinced me that we should adopt what he repeatedly refers to as neurotic cleanliness unique to the Japanese people. As he mentions, this labeling of cleanliness as neurotic or uniquely Japanese has caused much resistance and backlash. In order to get people to buy into this conceptual change, we need to get past these labels. Chu's discussion remains steeped in these labels and limiting constructs.
Perhaps a more apt question is: What ever happened to the Taiwanese people's love of cleanliness, which was adopted during the Japanese occupation of Taiwan. Some Taiwanese may recall that during that period, everyone engaged in the annually celebrated ritual of a New Year's cleaning. With the coming of the New Year and its festivities came New Year's cleaning, much like what we call spring cleaning in North America. Out with the old and in with the new.
Houses were meticulously cleaned from top to bottom. Borough wardens inspected individual homes and issued special certificates of recognition for homes dutifully cleaned for the New Year. And families proudly displayed these certificates of honor.
Cleanliness is not necessarily a matter of national identity, though in Japan's case it may be. The Taiwanese need not emulate the Japanese; in fact some might take exception to this simply due to the historical relationship that Taiwan has with Japan.
Taiwan needs to simply focus on improving the quality of life of its residents. This can be done by adopting the virtues of cleanliness, orderliness and accountability. These are virtues that many developed nations adhere to in the interest of maintaining a healthy nation both literally and figuratively.
Felicia Lin
Kaohsiung
A recent report concerning a student who is suing his teacher posed the question in its headline: Does failing a student in two subjects constitute bullying? The college student in Chiayi County apparently sought NT$2 million (US$63,603) in state compensation, but a court dismissed the case. The first reaction of many might have been to ask: What has happened to students nowadays? Some say that teachers have lost their authority, while others say students are overindulged. Some even start reminiscing over the days when “whatever the teacher says goes.” However, the real issue might be overlooked if emotional reactions like that are the
When I visited Taiwan last summer, I called on the nation to use its status as a technology superpower to build superweapons. It is obvious to me as I return a year later that Taiwan is now answering that call. By 2030, Taiwan envisions a domestic drone hub, capable of producing large quantities of drones per year. The nation continues to tighten cooperation across the private sector, scientific researchers and the elected government, on creating new and innovative production avenues for defense, while efforts to become central to the “democratic supply chain” are only increasing. Anduril is seeing all of these positive
Singaporean former Prime Minister and current senior minister Lee Hsien- Loong(李顯龍) last month stood on Chinese soil and told Beijing that Singapore cooperates because of “shared interests”, not because of common “ethnic descent,” a significant statement that has upended China’s cognitive warfare tactics of “ethnic nationalism.” Along with using its military buildup and economic growth to expand its international dominance, China has long deployed ethnic politics to promote the idea that all ethnic Chinese around the world, regardless of citizenship, share a tight bond with the Chinese motherland, by which it means the regime of the People’s Republic of China (PRC)
President William Lai Ching-te’s (賴清德) May 20 second-anniversary address was not just a routine policy review; it was damage control. US President Donald Trump’s remarks — that he did not want to see anyone move toward independence and that the delivery of a major Taiwan arms package could depend on the progress of US-China relations — unsettled Taiwan’s public and created an opening for opposition parties to question whether Taiwan was being treated as a bargaining chip in Washington’s dealings with Beijing. Lai’s speech was designed to close that opening. The address covered the expected ground: sovereignty, cross-strait relations, defense spending,