Loving cleanliness
Rick Chu (
But I'm not sure if Chu has convinced me that we should adopt what he repeatedly refers to as neurotic cleanliness unique to the Japanese people. As he mentions, this labeling of cleanliness as neurotic or uniquely Japanese has caused much resistance and backlash. In order to get people to buy into this conceptual change, we need to get past these labels. Chu's discussion remains steeped in these labels and limiting constructs.
Perhaps a more apt question is: What ever happened to the Taiwanese people's love of cleanliness, which was adopted during the Japanese occupation of Taiwan. Some Taiwanese may recall that during that period, everyone engaged in the annually celebrated ritual of a New Year's cleaning. With the coming of the New Year and its festivities came New Year's cleaning, much like what we call spring cleaning in North America. Out with the old and in with the new.
Houses were meticulously cleaned from top to bottom. Borough wardens inspected individual homes and issued special certificates of recognition for homes dutifully cleaned for the New Year. And families proudly displayed these certificates of honor.
Cleanliness is not necessarily a matter of national identity, though in Japan's case it may be. The Taiwanese need not emulate the Japanese; in fact some might take exception to this simply due to the historical relationship that Taiwan has with Japan.
Taiwan needs to simply focus on improving the quality of life of its residents. This can be done by adopting the virtues of cleanliness, orderliness and accountability. These are virtues that many developed nations adhere to in the interest of maintaining a healthy nation both literally and figuratively.
Felicia Lin
Kaohsiung
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime
After “Operation Absolute Resolve” to capture former Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro, the US joined Israel on Saturday last week in launching “Operation Epic Fury” to remove Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his theocratic regime leadership team. The two blitzes are widely believed to be a prelude to US President Donald Trump changing the geopolitical landscape in the Indo-Pacific region, targeting China’s rise. In the National Security Strategic report released in December last year, the Trump administration made it clear that the US would focus on “restoring American pre-eminence in the Western hemisphere,” and “competing with China economically and militarily