Loving cleanliness
Rick Chu (
But I'm not sure if Chu has convinced me that we should adopt what he repeatedly refers to as neurotic cleanliness unique to the Japanese people. As he mentions, this labeling of cleanliness as neurotic or uniquely Japanese has caused much resistance and backlash. In order to get people to buy into this conceptual change, we need to get past these labels. Chu's discussion remains steeped in these labels and limiting constructs.
Perhaps a more apt question is: What ever happened to the Taiwanese people's love of cleanliness, which was adopted during the Japanese occupation of Taiwan. Some Taiwanese may recall that during that period, everyone engaged in the annually celebrated ritual of a New Year's cleaning. With the coming of the New Year and its festivities came New Year's cleaning, much like what we call spring cleaning in North America. Out with the old and in with the new.
Houses were meticulously cleaned from top to bottom. Borough wardens inspected individual homes and issued special certificates of recognition for homes dutifully cleaned for the New Year. And families proudly displayed these certificates of honor.
Cleanliness is not necessarily a matter of national identity, though in Japan's case it may be. The Taiwanese need not emulate the Japanese; in fact some might take exception to this simply due to the historical relationship that Taiwan has with Japan.
Taiwan needs to simply focus on improving the quality of life of its residents. This can be done by adopting the virtues of cleanliness, orderliness and accountability. These are virtues that many developed nations adhere to in the interest of maintaining a healthy nation both literally and figuratively.
Felicia Lin
Kaohsiung
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several