On May 13, the US, Argentina, Canada and Egypt and nine other countries announced a request for WTO consultations with the EU over its moratorium on approving agricultural biotechnology products. The overwhelming preponderance of legal and scientific evidence supports their decision to challenge the EU over its stance on agricultural biotechnology.
Over the past five years, the EU has consistently violated the WTO's rules that require measures regulating imports to be based on sufficient scientific evidence and for regulatory approval procedures to be operated without undue delay. EU mem-bers have blocked regulatory approval of new agricultural biotechnology products since 1998 and have done so without presenting any scientific evidence demonstrating a danger to human health as required under the WTO Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) Agreement.
Simply put, the EU moratorium has no scientific basis. Bioengineered foods on the market have been shown to be as safe as conventional varieties. As noted by the French Academy of Sciences, more than 300 million Americans have been eating bioengineered corn and soybeans for years with no adverse consequences reported. The EU itself acknowledges that biotech foods on the market pose no threat to human health.
Unfortunately, the EU moratorium on agricultural biotechnology approvals has ramifications far beyond Europe. The EU's refusal to meet its WTO obligations is slowing down the adoption of a beneficial technology, and developing countries have already suffered negative consequences.
Last fall, some famine-stricken southern African countries balked at US food aid because of ill-informed health and environmental concerns, as well as fears that the countries' exports to Europe would be jeopardized by "contamination" of local crops. The introduction of vitamin-enhanced "Golden Rice" could dramatically reduce the incidence of childhood blindness in Asia. Those who stand to benefit the most from agricultural biotechnology do not have time on their side.
The spillover effects of the EU moratorium threaten to negate the benefits of biotechnology, which can help stimulate agricultural productivity and raise living standards. Farmers worldwide have recognized the economic, agricultural and environmental benefits of biotech crops. Biotech crops could help Taiwan's farmers compete more effectively in world markets.
Up to 80 percent of some crops in Africa are presently lost to drought. Biotech drought-resistant crops can help produce food in developing countries struggling to feed their populations while raising rural incomes.
Increased use of agricultural biotechnology can also yield substantial environmental benefits. Farmers utilizing biotech crops can reduce soil erosion and pesticide use. Biotech crops create more hospitable environments for wildlife, including streams and rivers spared from chemical pesticides. Farmers who are able to increase crop yields on existing land will be less tempted to encroach upon tropical rainforests and other fragile natural habitats.
At the same time, biotechnology can create high-paying jobs and stimulate economic development. It could revolutionize the way we live as much, or even more, than computer technology.
Finally, those who claim that the US is trying to force biotech foods on consumers have actually got the argument backwards. It is the EU's unilateral, illegal and unjustified actions which constrain choice and opportunity worldwide. The US and others seek regulations that maximize consumer choice while at the same time protecting consumer health and safety. We hope that the people of Taiwan will support the US as we move in the WTO to protect this life saving and growth enhancing technology.
Douglas Paal is director of the American Institute in Taiwan.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) in San Francisco on Tuesday last week said if she had not met with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), she would have been “just a plain” and “even negligible” KMT chairperson, bluntly signaling the role she is playing in her visit to the US — Beijing’s messenger from Taiwan. Cheng and her delegation arrived in the US on Monday last week for a two-week visit across five major cities. Her party said the group is scheduled to meet with US lawmakers, officials, policy experts and businesspeople. Before departing, Cheng said her trip
The Comedy Club on Fuxing N Road in Taipei was vandalized with paint bombs mixed with feces on May 29, allegedly because one of its performers had satirized Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). The incident has triggered concerns about the growing threat from China’s cross-border repression within Taiwan. On the day of the attack, a comedian surnamed Huang (黃), who is known for mocking Xi, was the headline performer. The Comedy Club founder said the assault was obviously politically motivated. China, which Freedom House said “conducts the most sophisticated, extensive and far-reaching campaign of transnational repression in the world,” has
In 1935, the German Reich led by the National Socialist Party officially created the Nuremberg Race Laws, a “legal cage”, for German Jews, stripping them of citizenship, criminalizing their personal relationships, barring them from public life, and transforming them into stateless subjects and isolating them from the rest of society. Similarly, in March 2026, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) National People’s Congress adopted the “Promoting Ethnic Unity and Progress” law, which represents the most significant shift in Chinese domestic governance since the era of Mao Zedong (毛澤東). Ostensibly designed as domestic legislation to manage China’s 56 officially recognized ethnic groups,
China’s Taiwan Affairs Office spokesperson Zhu Fenglian (朱鳳蓮) at a press conference last week repeated the same, tired line, claiming that Taiwan’s future should be “decided jointly by the more than 1.4 billion Chinese people, including Taiwan compatriots.” The statement is absurd. Virtually every word is incorrect, with some parts mistaken to an astonishing degree. First, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never included Taiwan. When the Republic of China’s (ROC) original five-colored flag was established in 1912, Taiwan was still under Japanese rule. When the PRC was founded in 1949, Taiwan was under the control of president Chiang
RSS