Once again Taiwan's bid to become an observer to the World Health Organization (WHO) has failed to make it onto the World Health Assembly's agenda -- despite the SARS epidemic here and Beijing's unconscionable cover-up of its own SARS problem. The message to the people of Taiwan is that whenever this nation is faced with a future epidemic, they shouldn't hold their breath waiting for help from the WHO.
How could a supposedly lofty organization such as the WHO continue to allow outdated political considerations to override the right of millions of people in this country to proper health care -- especially since such a move places the health of billions more around the world at risk? WHO members must make a conscientious choice based on professional medical knowledge, instead of blindly handing over the responsibility of caring for the people of Taiwan to Beijing's bloodied hands.
Political considerations aside, the decision was clearly mistaken from a health-care point of view. After all, the quality of medical services in China is far behind that of Taiwan -- something WHO officials know very well. So how could a medically more advanced region be "well in the care" of one with lower medical standards?
Epidemiologists worldwide agree that many epidemics affecting China and the rest of Asia originate from southern China, a region with a high population density, warm, humid weather and the close cohabitation of human beings and animals. Taiwanese species often have no resistance against the diseases coming from China, as shown by the foot-and-mouth disease outbreak in March 1997 that decimated the domestic hog industry.
Now an epidemic that originated in Guangdong Province is killing people and wreaking havoc in Taiwan -- as it has in Hong Kong, Singapore, Toronto, Beijing and many other places.
The fact that Taiwan needs help from the WHO is beyond doubt. According to reports from Taiwanese medical experts, one of the major causes behind the recent hospital outbreaks of SARS is that the virus often hides under the cover of chronic diseases such as gall bladder inflammation, kidney problems and heart disease. Due to the lack of experience in treating SARS, many doctors have misdiagnosed patients.
The WHO extended its help to Singapore within days of the first reports of SARS there. It took more than six weeks for it to send a small team here. If the WHO had sent more personnel and sufficient help in the early phases of the outbreak to help with case detection, doctors might have detected hidden SARS cases sooner. Taiwan might not have had to learn the lesson at such a terrible price.
The hospital outbreaks at National Taiwan University and Mackay Memorial Hospital in Taipei, as well as Chang Gung Memorial Hospital in Kaohsiung, were the result of misdiagnosis.
The WHO has rejected Taiwan for the seventh time, but that does not mean the people of this nation should give up. Perhaps the people should follow President Chen Shui-bian's (
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS