A well-known tale from the Romance of the Three Kingdoms (
Ma Su was like a son to Kung Ming. Yet Kung Ming knew that to maintain order and discipline among his troops, the general had to be punished. So Ma Su was beheaded and his head put on public display as a warning to others.
The battle against SARS has entered a new phase with the outbreak of infections at several major hospitals. President Chen Shui-bian's (
Now all eyes are on Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (
Both Twu Shiing-jer and Chen Tzay-jinn go a long way back with the president. When President Chen was the Taipei mayor, Twu served as the director of the Bureau of Health and Chen Tzay-jinn was the superintendent of Taipei Municipal Hoping Hospital. Letting them go couldn't have been an easy decision for President Chen. But he did it anyway because it was the right thing to do.
In contrast, when Ma was pressured by members of the Taipei City Council about Chiu's departure, Ma still insisted that all issues regarding fault and punishment could wait until after the battle was over.
But the problem is that the health and lives of the public can't wait. Ma's arguments might have made sense in an earlier phase of this battle. But, more than two months after the initial case of SARS infection, the government's efforts to prevent and control the epidemic have shown too little progress and made a mockery of the government's boasting about zero deaths and zero community transmissions.
This country has already lost five brave medical personnel to the epidemic. In comparison, in Hong Kong -- where the SARS death toll is much higher -- only two medical personnel have died.
This widespread infection of medical personnel surely has something to do with the extreme shortage of medical protective equipment, including simple things such as masks, in hospitals over the past weeks.
Everyone thought that a harsh and valuable lesson had been learned from the nightmarish experiences at the Taipei Municipal Hoping Hospital and Jen Chi Hospital. But instead of containing and preventing SARS infections within those facilities, the outbreak has spread not only to the university hospital but also to the Mackay Memorial Hospital in Taipei and the Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital.
But even now many suspected SARS patients with high fevers are still being kicked around between the hospitals due to the insufficient number of sick beds for the squarantined. Many of these individuals have to stay in the emergency rooms for days, where they expose not only the medical personnel but also other patients to the risk of SARS infection.
Under the circumstances, is it too much to ask the heads of government agencies and bodies responsible for supervision of these hospitals to be accountable? More than ample opportunities and time have been given for the government officials in charge to make up for their past mistakes and improve the situation. Instead, they have come up with nothing.
If health officials can't do the job, government leaders should execute judgment and find others who can.
Taiwan’s higher education system is facing an existential crisis. As the demographic drop-off continues to empty classrooms, universities across the island are locked in a desperate battle for survival, international student recruitment and crucial Ministry of Education funding. To win this battle, institutions have turned to what seems like an objective measure of quality: global university rankings. Unfortunately, this chase is a costly illusion, and taxpayers are footing the bill. In the past few years, the goalposts have shifted from pure research output to “sustainability” and “societal impact,” largely driven by commercial metrics such as the UK-based Times Higher Education (THE) Impact
The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has sent the vast Asian chemicals industry into a tailspin. Deprived of the likes of Qatari natural gas and Saudi Arabian oil, the region’s fertilizer and plastics plants are slowing production or even shutting down. Everywhere except China, that is. In petrochemicals, China is unique. As well as a traditional industry that uses oil and gas as feedstock, it has parallel output that relies on its abundant domestic coal. Unsurprisingly, India and other regional powers want to copy and paste the Chinese method. This would not be easy — or climate friendly. The
History might remember 2026, not 2022, as the year artificial intelligence (AI) truly changed everything. ChatGPT’s launch was a product moment. What is happening now is an anthropological moment: AI is no longer merely answering questions. It is now taking initiative and learning from others to get things done, behaving less like software and more like a colleague. The economic consequence is the rise of the one-person company — a structure anticipated in the 2024 book The Choices Amid Great Changes, which I coauthored. The real target of AI is not labor. It is hierarchy. When AI sharply reduces the cost
US President Donald Trump recently repeated his claim that “Taiwan stole America’s chip industry,” reigniting public debate on the issue. As a former Taiwanese minister of economic affairs and an entrepreneur deeply involved in semiconductor supply chain development, I feel a responsibility to clarify this misunderstanding. From the perspective of global industrial evolution and the economic principle of comparative advantage, such a statement appears overly simplistic and risks obscuring the essence of the issue. The rise of Taiwan’s semiconductor industry was not built on “replacing America,” but rather emerged as a result of countries pursuing different development paths within the