Many Taiwanese businesspeople in China have been affected by the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) outbreak. Some of them are even infected with the disease and are in critical condition. People can still avoid the contagion if they act cautiously. But the Chinese government is addicted to its bad habit of forging statistics and controlling the media to hide facts. This habit may cause greater damage to enterprises and investors in China than SARS does.
Statistics provided by China's central and local governments are often incorrect. For example, they usually overestimate production and underestimate taxes, making it very difficult for foreign enterprises to receive clear, dependable market information and economic indexes.
Influenced by such statistics and information, foreign enterprises are unable to make appropriate decisions and usually overestimate business opportunities. This eventually leads to the failure of their business operations.
Fake and boastful statistics can be seen everywhere and come as no surprise in today's China. Many US scholars repeatedly question China's economic growth rate, asking if it may be exaggerated. Misled by the highly overestimated growth rate, many foreign investors strive to invest in China, ultimately causing a deflation problem.
The Chinese government has long subsidized the money-losing state-run enterprises, causing a huge deficit. Since 1983, it has demanded that public banks loan to state-run enterprises to reduce this deficit. As a result, the bad loan ratios of the public banks are as high as 50 percent. They would have gone bankrupt long ago if this had happened in a democratic country. Bad loans at these banks represent an estimated US$500 billion, which accounts for 43 percent of China's GDP.
If we also take the losses in its social welfare and elderly subsidies into account, its internal and external debts are estimated to have exceeded its GDP.
Thanks to its people's relatively high savings ratio (over 40 percent) and the US$40 billion to US$50 billion in foreign capital that pours into its market every year, China enjoys sufficient flow of capital domestically, while the channels for investment are limited. The government has tightly controlled the media, so people are not aware of the real situation. They think that the government is capable of protecting their savings and continue to put their money into these banks.
Moreover, foreign exchange control is tight in an effort to reduce possible capital outflow. People have no choice but to hold yuan, since foreign currencies are not available. China has also strictly kept in check the local business operations of foreign banks in order to prohibit foreign investors' speculation in foreign exchange. All these factors and measures have kept the nation's financial market stable for the time being.
China is facing a potential financial crisis, which may be triggered at any time. The crisis may be ignited if people lose their confidence in the government when it becomes unable to hide the massive amount of bad loans and debts. It may also take place when the global economic downturn damages China's export or direct foreign investment figures. The significant impact of the 1997 Asian financial crisis is still fresh in our memory. If a financial crisis occurs in China, it will cause overall damage to the currency and stock markets. None of the Taiwanese businesspeople in China can escape from such a disaster.
In light of the SARS epidemic in China, are Taiwanese busi-nesspeople ready to reduce investments there in order to lower their risks?
Peter Lin is director of the Graduate Institute of Operation and Management at Kao Yuan Institute of Technology.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry