Many Taiwanese businesspeople in China have been affected by the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) outbreak. Some of them are even infected with the disease and are in critical condition. People can still avoid the contagion if they act cautiously. But the Chinese government is addicted to its bad habit of forging statistics and controlling the media to hide facts. This habit may cause greater damage to enterprises and investors in China than SARS does.
Statistics provided by China's central and local governments are often incorrect. For example, they usually overestimate production and underestimate taxes, making it very difficult for foreign enterprises to receive clear, dependable market information and economic indexes.
Influenced by such statistics and information, foreign enterprises are unable to make appropriate decisions and usually overestimate business opportunities. This eventually leads to the failure of their business operations.
Fake and boastful statistics can be seen everywhere and come as no surprise in today's China. Many US scholars repeatedly question China's economic growth rate, asking if it may be exaggerated. Misled by the highly overestimated growth rate, many foreign investors strive to invest in China, ultimately causing a deflation problem.
The Chinese government has long subsidized the money-losing state-run enterprises, causing a huge deficit. Since 1983, it has demanded that public banks loan to state-run enterprises to reduce this deficit. As a result, the bad loan ratios of the public banks are as high as 50 percent. They would have gone bankrupt long ago if this had happened in a democratic country. Bad loans at these banks represent an estimated US$500 billion, which accounts for 43 percent of China's GDP.
If we also take the losses in its social welfare and elderly subsidies into account, its internal and external debts are estimated to have exceeded its GDP.
Thanks to its people's relatively high savings ratio (over 40 percent) and the US$40 billion to US$50 billion in foreign capital that pours into its market every year, China enjoys sufficient flow of capital domestically, while the channels for investment are limited. The government has tightly controlled the media, so people are not aware of the real situation. They think that the government is capable of protecting their savings and continue to put their money into these banks.
Moreover, foreign exchange control is tight in an effort to reduce possible capital outflow. People have no choice but to hold yuan, since foreign currencies are not available. China has also strictly kept in check the local business operations of foreign banks in order to prohibit foreign investors' speculation in foreign exchange. All these factors and measures have kept the nation's financial market stable for the time being.
China is facing a potential financial crisis, which may be triggered at any time. The crisis may be ignited if people lose their confidence in the government when it becomes unable to hide the massive amount of bad loans and debts. It may also take place when the global economic downturn damages China's export or direct foreign investment figures. The significant impact of the 1997 Asian financial crisis is still fresh in our memory. If a financial crisis occurs in China, it will cause overall damage to the currency and stock markets. None of the Taiwanese businesspeople in China can escape from such a disaster.
In light of the SARS epidemic in China, are Taiwanese busi-nesspeople ready to reduce investments there in order to lower their risks?
Peter Lin is director of the Graduate Institute of Operation and Management at Kao Yuan Institute of Technology.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS