"Free Palestine" said the placards held up by some marchers on the anti-war demonstrations. Well, here's a surprise for them: this bloody mess of a war may result in a free Palestine.
Let me explain, through this extract from the 2020 edition of the Oxford History of the Contemporary World: "Curiously, the Iraq war can now be seen as the turning-point in progress towards an independent Palestinian state. Of course American forces, with their overwhelming technological superiority, succeeded militarily in defeating Iraqi President Saddam Hussein, but, as one American general ruefully observed, the enemy was `a bit different from the one we wargamed against.' The military campaign therefore resulted in civilian casualties and damage to Islamic holy places that inflamed resentment across the whole Arab world. One young Egyptian sarcastically remarked to a western television interviewer: `thank you very much British and Americans, because you're waking us up,'
"British troops were soon comparing their street-by-street struggle against paramilitary groups to Northern Ireland. This proved prescient. For the subsequent occupation of Iraq was like Northern Ireland, only worse. A large majority of Iraqis were delighted to be rid of Saddam; this did not mean they welcomed a colonial administration imposed by Washington, headed by a retired American general and including a minister of finance who was a former head of the CIA. British forces prided themselves on being more subtle than the Americans in winning the `hearts and minds' of a restless population, but they underestimated the depth of historic resentment directed specifically against Britain, the former colonial power in both Iraq and Palestine."
ILLUSTRATION: MOUNTAIN PEOPLE
"A relatively small number of Iraqi paramilitaries and suicide bombers compelled the Anglo-American occupying forces to use tactics that, seen throughout the Arab world on Al Jazeera television, reminded Arabs everywhere of Israeli soldiers' behavior in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. Nor did it help that the American viceroy of Iraq, General Jay Garner, conceded far-reaching autonomy to the Kurds in northern Iraq, who had been valuable American allies on the northern front of the military campaign against Saddam, and who were the only group in Iraq to remain unambiguously pro-American under the occupation."
"Critics of the war had predicted that, in the somber words of Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, it would produce a hundred new Osama bin Ladens. These predictions did not entirely come true. But in the aftermath of the war, there were renewed Islamist terror attacks, especially in Europe, whose large muslim population provided excellent cover for Al Qaeda and other groups. The November 2003 bombing of a shopping center in central London, which killed 37 people, was a notably horrific incident. There was also growing discontent among Muslim Americans."
"As the human, political and financial costs of occupying Iraq mounted, while the American economy plunged further into recession, criticism of the Bush administration grew in the US. Moderate Republicans privately agreed with Democrats that the administration had led the country into a morass in the Middle East, while alienating many of the US' friends around the world. This applied particularly to Europe. Even Britain, America's most stalwart ally, was incensed by the lack of any serious progress along the `road map' to resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict."
"After George W. Bush narrowly lost the November 2004 election [ironically enough, following a recount in Florida], the new administration hastened to change course. In an attempt to mend fences with both the Arab world and the Europeans, it withdrew its troops from Iraq, handing control over to the Iraqis and Kurds, and started exerting serious pressure on the Sharon government in Israel to come back to the negotiating table with the Palestinians. President Smith was greatly helped in this endeavor by the death of Yasser Arafat, and the advent of a more reasonable Palestinian leadership. The European Union, which had been pressing for such negotiations, was also useful in exerting economic leverage on the Palestinians."
"As a result, in 2005 a deal was finally made which gave the Palestinians a viable state in boundaries only slightly more generous than those they had been offered by President Clinton in 2000. The Gaza strip was connected to the West Bank, as Clinton had already proposed, by a futuristic raised road and rail highway -- paid for by the Europeans, and jokingly known as the Eurostar. The deal was violently resisted by Hamas fighters, on the Palestinian side, and Israeli settlers on the other. There were several appalling incidents of violence, which finally resulted in most of the settlers in the areas assigned to Palestine fleeing to Israel. A permanent fence was then erected between Israel and Palestine; in parts of Jerusalem it looked like the Berlin Wall. The whole process was bloody, unjust and arbitrary -- but, as in former Yugoslavia, physical separation eventually turned out to be a lesser evil. In time, and with a lot of help from the international community, the two sides started to cooperate, as they both needed to for their own economic survival."
"From his hideaway, Osama bin Laden [or someone claiming to be Osama bin Laden] gloated that `the heroic jihad that began on Sept. 11, 2001 has triumphed with the establishment of an independent state for our brothers in Palestine and the withdrawal of infidel forces from Iraq.' On the face of it, this was a crushing defeat for the whole group of American policymakers, identified particularly with Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz, who had seen the invasion of Iraq as the beginning of a democratic reordering of the whole Middle East. No-one was more outspoken in criticizing President Smith than the former Defense Secretary, Donald Rumsfeld. `Neville Chamberlain' was his politest epithet."
"Yet history always has more than one surprise up its sleeve. After an initial period of pan-Arab triumphalism, a new generation of Arab leaders and voters realized that it was now up to them. They could remain in a state of historic backwardness, or they could set out to join the modern world which now beckoned so attractively from just across the Turkish border, in the European Union. Even while Anglo-American occupation had been fiercely resisted, its attempts to win `hearts and minds' -- the broadcasts of Radio Free Middle East, the Fulbright scholarships for young Arabs to study in the West, the imports of Western films, music and magazines -- had made a subcutaneous impact. With the Palestinians now living in a viable state, Arab states finally came to accept the permanent presence of the state of Israel. Within a decade, it was the Arabs themselves who were beginning to reorder the Middle East as a patchwork of consumer democracies. In the end, Wolfowitz's vision was realized, but by a route that he neither envisaged nor desired."
It's a measure of the mess we're in that this might now pass for an optimistic history of the future. Of course we never know what will really happen, until it does, but two things are clear. First, one of history's very few universal laws is the law of unintended consequences. By starting this war, US President George W. Bush and British Prime Minister Tony Blair have thrown large parts of the jigsaw puzzle of world politics into the air. They have as little idea as we do where the pieces will fall. Second, if Europe has any sense at all (which recent events also lead one to doubt) it will start now to develop its own ideas for a democratic reconstruction of the Middle East -- in readiness for 2005.
Timothy Garton Ash is a fellow of St Antony's College, Oxford, and the Hoover Institution, Stanford.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
After more than a year of review, the National Security Bureau on Monday said it has completed a sweeping declassification of political archives from the Martial Law period, transferring the full collection to the National Archives Administration under the National Development Council. The move marks another significant step in Taiwan’s long journey toward transitional justice. The newly opened files span the architecture of authoritarian control: internal security and loyalty investigations, intelligence and counterintelligence operations, exit and entry controls, overseas surveillance of Taiwan independence activists, and case materials related to sedition and rebellion charges. For academics of Taiwan’s White Terror era —
After 37 US lawmakers wrote to express concern over legislators’ stalling of critical budgets, Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) pledged to make the Executive Yuan’s proposed NT$1.25 trillion (US$39.7 billion) special defense budget a top priority for legislative review. On Tuesday, it was finally listed on the legislator’s plenary agenda for Friday next week. The special defense budget was proposed by President William Lai’s (賴清德) administration in November last year to enhance the nation’s defense capabilities against external threats from China. However, the legislature, dominated by the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), repeatedly blocked its review. The
In her article in Foreign Affairs, “A Perfect Storm for Taiwan in 2026?,” Yun Sun (孫韻), director of the China program at the Stimson Center in Washington, said that the US has grown indifferent to Taiwan, contending that, since it has long been the fear of US intervention — and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) inability to prevail against US forces — that has deterred China from using force against Taiwan, this perceived indifference from the US could lead China to conclude that a window of opportunity for a Taiwan invasion has opened this year. Most notably, she observes that
RSS