The Kaohsiung City Council opened its new session on Tuesday, with its speaker and vice speaker still in police custody on vote-buying charges. The TSU's legislative caucus and more than a dozen non-governmental organizations (NGOs) from Kaohsiung staged a protest, demanding that all the councilors implicated in the vote-buying scandal step down voluntarily so that by-elections can be held. A clash between demonstrators and police resulted in injuries to some TSU legislators and reporters.
The city council immediately issued a statement condemning the violence and calling on "people not to trample on democracy in the name of democracy or shame Kaohsiung City."
The statement leaves one wondering whether to laugh or cry. Apparently it was a case of the thief crying "Thief!" A city council that shames the entire country is now accusing the protesters of shaming the city.
We are absolutely against violence, but people who criticize Tuesday's clash are missing the point. They are deliberately trying to divert attention from the facts and sideline the demands of the protesters.
What's even more unfortunate was that only TSU legislators attended the protest, while the DPP voiced support from Taipei. KMT and PFP lawmakers were perhaps too busy scheming for next year's presidential election, or perhaps their two chairmen, Lien Chan (連戰) and James Soong (宋楚瑜), were still basking in the euphoria of their nominations to run for the presidency by their respective parties on Sunday. They may have forgotten that when the vote-buying scandal broke the parties scrambled to expel their bribe-taking councilors and vowed to push for the recall of the speaker and vice speaker. Now the two parties seem to be interested only in grabbing power next year. For them, Kaohsiung's vote-buying scandal has long ago blown away with the wind.
They are wrong. The people's anger is not gone yet. The KMT-PFP reticence on the matter only reflects their political miscalculation. Having talked so much about eradicating "black gold" corruption, the two parties have once again proved how hypocritical they are.
The DPP also expressed indignation about the matter on Tuesday. After a meeting of the party's Central Standing Committee, committee member Kao Jyh-peng (高志鵬), speaking on the party's behalf, immediately called on Kaohsiung's residents and NGOs to push for the recall of the council's speaker and vice speaker. Kao also criticized the KMT and the PFP for blocking the DPP's proposals for reforming the city council.
To resolve the legal and political problems posed by the vote-buying scandal, the DPP has already proposed amendments to the Law on Local Government Systems (地方制度法) and the Election and Recall Law (選舉罷免法). Under the new amendments, council speakers and vice speakers could be suspended from their posts once they are found guilty in court. They could also be recalled in the first year of their term, as opposed to having to wait until the second year, as is the case now. The proposal has been sent to the Legislative Yuan for review.
Kao angrily slammed the opposition camp on Tuesday for blocking the proposed amendments. He also called on them to quickly negotiate and pass the bills so as to resolve the problems facing the Kaohsiung City Council and to prevent similar scandals in the future.
Old habits don't die easily, however. The KMT is a party with "black gold" roots while the PFP is one of the KMT's splinter parties. They have vowed time and again to eradicate the cancer of "black gold," but their vows have turned out to be all bark, no bite.
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
After “Operation Absolute Resolve” to capture former Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro, the US joined Israel on Saturday last week in launching “Operation Epic Fury” to remove Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his theocratic regime leadership team. The two blitzes are widely believed to be a prelude to US President Donald Trump changing the geopolitical landscape in the Indo-Pacific region, targeting China’s rise. In the National Security Strategic report released in December last year, the Trump administration made it clear that the US would focus on “restoring American pre-eminence in the Western hemisphere,” and “competing with China economically and militarily