The Kaohsiung City Council opened its new session on Tuesday, with its speaker and vice speaker still in police custody on vote-buying charges. The TSU's legislative caucus and more than a dozen non-governmental organizations (NGOs) from Kaohsiung staged a protest, demanding that all the councilors implicated in the vote-buying scandal step down voluntarily so that by-elections can be held. A clash between demonstrators and police resulted in injuries to some TSU legislators and reporters.
The city council immediately issued a statement condemning the violence and calling on "people not to trample on democracy in the name of democracy or shame Kaohsiung City."
The statement leaves one wondering whether to laugh or cry. Apparently it was a case of the thief crying "Thief!" A city council that shames the entire country is now accusing the protesters of shaming the city.
We are absolutely against violence, but people who criticize Tuesday's clash are missing the point. They are deliberately trying to divert attention from the facts and sideline the demands of the protesters.
What's even more unfortunate was that only TSU legislators attended the protest, while the DPP voiced support from Taipei. KMT and PFP lawmakers were perhaps too busy scheming for next year's presidential election, or perhaps their two chairmen, Lien Chan (連戰) and James Soong (宋楚瑜), were still basking in the euphoria of their nominations to run for the presidency by their respective parties on Sunday. They may have forgotten that when the vote-buying scandal broke the parties scrambled to expel their bribe-taking councilors and vowed to push for the recall of the speaker and vice speaker. Now the two parties seem to be interested only in grabbing power next year. For them, Kaohsiung's vote-buying scandal has long ago blown away with the wind.
They are wrong. The people's anger is not gone yet. The KMT-PFP reticence on the matter only reflects their political miscalculation. Having talked so much about eradicating "black gold" corruption, the two parties have once again proved how hypocritical they are.
The DPP also expressed indignation about the matter on Tuesday. After a meeting of the party's Central Standing Committee, committee member Kao Jyh-peng (高志鵬), speaking on the party's behalf, immediately called on Kaohsiung's residents and NGOs to push for the recall of the council's speaker and vice speaker. Kao also criticized the KMT and the PFP for blocking the DPP's proposals for reforming the city council.
To resolve the legal and political problems posed by the vote-buying scandal, the DPP has already proposed amendments to the Law on Local Government Systems (地方制度法) and the Election and Recall Law (選舉罷免法). Under the new amendments, council speakers and vice speakers could be suspended from their posts once they are found guilty in court. They could also be recalled in the first year of their term, as opposed to having to wait until the second year, as is the case now. The proposal has been sent to the Legislative Yuan for review.
Kao angrily slammed the opposition camp on Tuesday for blocking the proposed amendments. He also called on them to quickly negotiate and pass the bills so as to resolve the problems facing the Kaohsiung City Council and to prevent similar scandals in the future.
Old habits don't die easily, however. The KMT is a party with "black gold" roots while the PFP is one of the KMT's splinter parties. They have vowed time and again to eradicate the cancer of "black gold," but their vows have turned out to be all bark, no bite.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of