A foolhardy plan
If the Taipei Times' story is true, then I must say that the Aborigines around the future Makao National Park have lost the moral high ground in their plea for justice ("Aborigines threaten to set national park ablaze," Jan. 4, page 2).
They feel that they are victims of the central government when stating that they have not been properly consulted on a matter so close to their life, history and traditions. They "feel angry, very angry." I sympathize with them and agree that the people living in and around the land designated to be a national park should be properly consulted throughout the process.
But when they affirm that "if it goes ahead we will set fire to the mountain in the park," it works completely against their plea and forces me to distance myself from them.
Why do the Aborigines want to be consulted in the matter when they are prepared to resort to setting ablaze an entire mountain without concern for the living ecosystem it houses? To call it preposterous and outrageous is not enough. If they want to play a key role in the design and development of the National Park it should be with the intention of protecting it. If they are prepared to vent their anger by setting fire to the entire mountain (the words of a high-ranking aboriginal leader), I sincerely invite them to ask themselves whether they are truly up to that task.
They feel that they are victims of the bureaucratic system and instead of looking for ways to overcome this situation they just make an even bigger victim of the land they claim they are protecting. Do they really think they are threatening the government?
If they want to set something alight and really threaten the government, I would suggest places like the Presidential Office, the Ministry of the Interior, The Chiang Kai-Shek Memorial Hall and so on. The more than 21 hectares of land and biomass that comprise the proposed park are guilty of nothing. If you want to retaliate, please first identify who is the real enemy, if there is one. Do not condemn to death what cannot defend and speak for itself. We are all visitors who do not remain -- even the Aborigines.
Francisco Carin Garcia
Taishan, Taipei County
We need our own museum
I wholeheartedly agree with the sentiments expressed in the editorial "Put Taiwan in the Palace Museum" (Jan. 5, page 8). The National Palace Museum could sometimes be more accurately called the Chinese Nationalist Museum. The decision to create a branch of the National Palace Museum in Chiayi County should be applauded, but exactly what the museum displays deserves consideration.
I suggest that the branch museum be called the Taiwan National Museum to avoid confusion.
While providing additional display space for the National Palace Museum's collection it should also work to develop a collection that shows Taiwan's history, which is very different from China's.
There is not only the question of what should be displayed, but how it should be displayed. The exhibits in the National Palace Museum are too static and do not take advantage of the latest multimedia technology.
A visit to another of Taiwan's museums, the Museum of World Religions, shows what a museum of the 21st century should be like. From the moment you enter, it creates an interactive environment that promotes learning. Museums should be places that people of all ages and backgrounds can enjoy and learn something from.
David Reid
Panchiao, Taipei County
EPA needs to have a rethink
Did the Environmental Protection Administration do its homework before introducing the new rules banning plastics bags, and recommending the use of paper bags?
I am not so sure that they did, for two reasons. First, there is a product used in Western countries called biodegradable plastic, which is environmentally-friendly. Second, paper bags are made of wood, and wood comes from trees. Fewer trees mean less oxygen.
Is it better to deprive ourselves and our children of oxygen or to pollute the earth with plastic bags, which in fact are also used to collect garbage?
Georges Ponzoni
Taoyuan
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused