China tightened its restrictions on the Internet recently, blocking access to the search engines Google and Alta Vista. Fortu-nately, these Web sites did not cave in to China's pressure. Google even said it would provide a different, moving portal site every day to break China's blockade. This means tackling China's "battlefield warfare" with "guerilla warfare." Faced with a tough opponent, China has turned to other strategies, one of which is to redirect users to other Web sites. The other is to allow access to the search engines in question but block Web pages that contain sensitive content, such as Falun Gong or President Jiang Zemin (
In the latest development, e-mail users who applied for Yahoo and Hotmail addresses from within China are prevented from opening their mail boxes whenever they receive an e-mail containing "sensitive" words. Netizens are complaining about this on the Web but they can do nothing about it. This indicates that China has improved its Internet blockade technology. Sending information from overseas to people in China has now become much more difficult. An online magazine run by overseas Chinese pro-democracy activists (www.bignews.org) has also received letters from readers asking for a moving Web site.
Foreign media have reported that it was US high-tech companies that provided China with the blocking technologies. Major companies including Cisco Systems, Nokia, Microsoft and Israel's CheckPoint Software Technologies are all vying to get a slice of the China market and are therefore willing to provide security services to China's dictators. A report said Cisco has made a killing out of cooperation with the Ministry of State Security and the People's Liberation Army.
Seeing only short-term gain, some business people lose sight of the big picture and ignore the interests of their countries. This seems to be the case in all countries. With straight faces, they give all kinds of justifications for their behavior. But their gains are temporary.
If foreign companies really want to make money in China, they should take heed of China's democratization and economic liberalization. Only when they do so will foreign firms develop their business in a fair environment and in compliance with fair legal regulations. Only by so doing will they minimize their trading costs -- especially invisible costs, such as those incurred because of loopholes in the legal system, flip-flopping policies, the impact of personnel changes on the guanxi network and the impact of social instability on the general business environment.
Christian Murck, chairman of the American Chamber of Commerce in China, complained recently that China has not made good on many of the pledges it made to gain WTO entry, including lifting restrictions on meat imports and on foreign banks. Capitol Hill's US-China Commission held a public hearing in June on whether China would be able to implement its WTO entry pledges. Neither the government nor the private sector was optimistic about the prospects.
In the face of China's best efforts to keep them down, China's resource-poor dissidents are trying their best to break the Internet blockade. For the sake of its own security, Taiwan needs to maintain its guard and establish countermeasures against a possible Chinese high-tech war.
Taiwan is in the middle of an economic transformation and needs to raise the quality of its high-tech products by a large margin. This will not only be good for economic development, but will also strengthen the nation's electronic warfare capabilities. If Taiwan can develop new technologies to breach China's information blockade, that will also be a contribution to China's democratization.
Paul Lin is a political commentator based in New York.
Translated by Francis Huang
Speaking at the Copenhagen Democracy Summit on May 13, former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said that democracies must remain united and that “Taiwan’s security is essential to regional stability and to defending democratic values amid mounting authoritarianism.” Earlier that day, Tsai had met with a group of Danish parliamentarians led by Danish Parliament Speaker Pia Kjaersgaard, who has visited Taiwan many times, most recently in November last year, when she met with President William Lai (賴清德) at the Presidential Office. Kjaersgaard had told Lai: “I can assure you that ... you can count on us. You can count on our support
Denmark has consistently defended Greenland in light of US President Donald Trump’s interests and has provided unwavering support to Ukraine during its war with Russia. Denmark can be proud of its clear support for peoples’ democratic right to determine their own future. However, this democratic ideal completely falls apart when it comes to Taiwan — and it raises important questions about Denmark’s commitment to supporting democracies. Taiwan lives under daily military threats from China, which seeks to take over Taiwan, by force if necessary — an annexation that only a very small minority in Taiwan supports. Denmark has given China a
Many local news media over the past week have reported on Internet personality Holger Chen’s (陳之漢) first visit to China between Tuesday last week and yesterday, as remarks he made during a live stream have sparked wide discussions and strong criticism across the Taiwan Strait. Chen, better known as Kuan Chang (館長), is a former gang member turned fitness celebrity and businessman. He is known for his live streams, which are full of foul-mouthed and hypermasculine commentary. He had previously spoken out against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and criticized Taiwanese who “enjoy the freedom in Taiwan, but want China’s money”
A high-school student surnamed Yang (楊) gained admissions to several prestigious medical schools recently. However, when Yang shared his “learning portfolio” on social media, he was caught exaggerating and even falsifying content, and his admissions were revoked. Now he has to take the “advanced subjects test” scheduled for next month. With his outstanding performance in the general scholastic ability test (GSAT), Yang successfully gained admissions to five prestigious medical schools. However, his university dreams have now been frustrated by the “flaws” in his learning portfolio. This is a wake-up call not only for students, but also teachers. Yang did make a big