With technology CEOs and monetary policy makers claiming no "visibility" in the first half of next year, can recovery be far off? Late last year, when the US economy was plowing headlong into a brick wall, neither group saw impact ahead.
For the Federal Reserve, the good times were viewed as too good, requiring a dose of interest-rate medicine from mid-1999 to mid-2000. As late as November last year, with the economy into its second quarter of sub-2 percent growth, Fed officials still saw all the risks to the economy weighted toward higher inflation.
CEOs from technology companies thought the future was bright.
At an analysts' meeting exactly one year ago, Cisco Systems Inc Chief Executive John Chambers said he had "never been more optimistic about the market opportunities for our industry as a whole and for Cisco within that market." He dispelled rumors that the company would be lowering its guidance.
It wasn't until January that Chambers acknowledged the slowdown in capital spending and admitted the outlook was "more challenging." So what are we to think now of the collective assessment of those attending Credit Suisse First Boston's technology conference last week that "none of us has any visibility right now?" If corporate CEOs were reliable forecasters of future business activity, why is the economy still reeling from an intense inventory correction one year after demand collapsed? This time around, the global interconnectedness as a result of the Internet was supposed to provide companies with superior information, preventing the dreaded build-up of inventories when demand slows.
In a paean to the New Economy on March 6 last year -- at the very moment the New Economy, as represented by the NASDAQ Composite Index, was cresting -- Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan voiced his belief in the ability of the Internet to reduce uncertainty and increase efficiency.
"Before this quantum jump in information availability, most business decisions were hampered by a fog of uncertainty," the chairman said in an address, entitled The Revolution in Information Technology, to a Boston College conference on the New Economy.
Unlike the pre-electronic age, when businesses had "limited and lagging knowledge of customers' needs" that led to a "doubling up on materials and people," real-time information, including an "electronic data interface between the retail checkout counter and the factory floor or the satellite location of trucks," was supposed to eliminate something as Old Economy as an inventory cycle.
"This surge in the availability of more timely information has enabled business management to remove large swaths of inventory safety stocks and worker redundancies," Greenspan said.
Of course, the swing in inventories from the fourth quarter of last year to the first quarter of this year -- an absolute US$70 billion -- was one of the largest in history. It nicked 2.6 percentage points from first-quarter real GDP growth.
Inventories were pared in the second and third quarters as well, and are expected to fall by some US$100 billion in the current quarter (all those zero percent financed cars that weren't built had to come from somewhere).
"The level of inventory building is more than US$100 billion below where it would be in normal times," says Jim Glassman, senior economist at J.P. Morgan Chase. "Even in an atmosphere of modest demand, businesses need to grow inventories at a US$25 to US$40 billion pace."
RSS