There has been little progress in the fight against world poverty in the last decade. Yet when the G8 leaders met in Genoa, Italy, two weeks ago, they chastised protesters with warnings that they would only obstruct progress for the poor.
Considering the facts, that was quite a display of arrogance. The World Bank calculates that a third to a fourth of the world's people still live in severe poverty -- and this is based on minimal poverty rates of $1 to $2 a day. The overall proportion has fallen only slightly in the last 10 years, and poverty levels have risen in many countries. Moreover, in poor regions, except Asia, income inequality has widened.
Insensitivity to the stunning facts is not limited to Western leaders. Mainstream economists have been notable for their silence.
At the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard, a highly attended weekend seminar was held in the early summer on the Clinton administration's economic policies. Yet hardly a word of criticism was raised about the US Treasury's heavy-handed advocacy of the rapid liberalization of capital flows, which many mainstream economists now concede contributed to the Asian financial crisis in 1997 and 1998, sending many people into poverty.
Today, Argentina and New Zealand, once virtual models for the ``liberalizing'' policies so widely encouraged by economists and global investors, are in serious difficulties. Argentina, which linked its currency to the dollar in 1991, amid plaudits from disciplinarians, totters on the brink of a financial crisis that could sweep up Brazil as well. New Zealand's growth rates are among the worst in the OECD. Yet there is little public outcry about mistaken policies.
In June, a small dissenting group of international economists and political scientists met to discuss this absence of a full public discourse. The conference was organized by two Harvard professors, Dani Rodrik, an economist at the Kennedy School, and Roberto Unger, a law professor. The two had taught a standing-room-only course at Harvard Law School on alternative development strategies in the spring.
The participants essentially found themselves up against a wall. Nations have little leeway to adopt policies that deviate from those accepted by institutions like the International Monetary Fund or those demanded by the financial markets. If they do, capital flees, interest rates rise and loans are not renewed.
Yet the truly regrettable irony is that the strategies advocated by today's economic and financial mainstream -- reduced government spending, privatization, unrestricted capital flows and completely free trade -- are not the policies that gave rise to the rapid growth of developing nations in the recent past. Had South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand or Brazil been restricted to the policies considered acceptable today, they would not have been such success stories.
As Rodrik points out, Taiwan and South Korea adopted aggressive industrial policies to subsidize crucial industries. Many of the fastest-growing nations owned and ran major industries and protected infant industries with high tariffs. Government investment in education was often strong in these nations. Most slowly depreciated their currencies, rather than adopt the floating currencies advocated today (or the fixed-currency regime used by Argentina). In sum, these nations integrated their economies with the advanced world -- not right away, but when they had matured and grown more prosperous.
Moreover, not only are successful policies often abandoned, but as the current plight of Argentina and New Zealand suggests, liberalizing policies often fail, too. Robert Wade, a political scientist at the London School of Economics, argues that few nations that were largely dependent on commodity exports, like New Zealand, have been able to transform themselves into successful producers of advanced goods based on such policies.
For Wade, such a transformation still requires an industrial policy. At times, it may require an import-substitution policy of high tariffs to protect developing domestic industries. But such policies were widely criticized as the main source of failure in Latin America in the 1980s. Wade counters that it was the indebtedness of many Latin American nations that created crises and poor growth in the 1980s, not import substitution, and that the establishment has essentially twisted the argument in its favor.
Neither Wade nor Rodrik, whose most recent book is Making Openness Work, believes there is one policy to fit all sizes. Import substitution may be appropriate to some, but not others. Both argue strongly that local conditions should be allowed to determine the right course, not international institutions with universal formulas. To Roberto Unger, however, the author most recently of Democracy Realized: The Progressive Alternative, only more sweeping change has a chance to work. Unger proposes not so much a blueprint but a profoundly new ``direction'' that includes high levels of government investment and taxes, required voting and forced savings to buffer states from the influence of international investors. Unger says his ideas have certainly not caught on among the establishment, but he is attracting a lot of interest from the younger generation. Given the levels of poverty, this is no surprise.
Yet the protesters in Genoa and elsewhere also naively denigrate the value of economic growth. Wade, for example, points out that there is no evidence that local participation in devising economic strategies, so widely advocated by protesting groups, will provide an answer to alleviating poverty unless it is accompanied by other pro-growth strategies.
What is surely the case, however, is that if nations remain under the thumb of single-minded international investors and their institutional surrogates, there will be little room for new ideas.
To mitigate the power of the financial markets requires leadership from the powerful themselves. But such leadership is absent not only in Washington and most other Western capitals but also in this nation's major academic centers.
ROLLER-COASTER RIDE: More than five earthquakes ranging from magnitude 4.4 to 5.5 on the Richter scale shook eastern Taiwan in rapid succession yesterday afternoon Back-to-back weather fronts are forecast to hit Taiwan this week, resulting in rain across the nation in the coming days, the Central Weather Administration said yesterday, as it also warned residents in mountainous regions to be wary of landslides and rockfalls. As the first front approached, sporadic rainfall began in central and northern parts of Taiwan yesterday, the agency said, adding that rain is forecast to intensify in those regions today, while brief showers would also affect other parts of the nation. A second weather system is forecast to arrive on Thursday, bringing additional rain to the whole nation until Sunday, it
LANDSLIDES POSSIBLE: The agency advised the public to avoid visiting mountainous regions due to more expected aftershocks and rainfall from a series of weather fronts A series of earthquakes over the past few days were likely aftershocks of the April 3 earthquake in Hualien County, with further aftershocks to be expected for up to a year, the Central Weather Administration (CWA) said yesterday. Based on the nation’s experience after the quake on Sept. 21, 1999, more aftershocks are possible over the next six months to a year, the agency said. A total of 103 earthquakes of magnitude 4 on the local magnitude scale or higher hit Hualien County from 5:08pm on Monday to 10:27am yesterday, with 27 of them exceeding magnitude 5. They included two, of magnitude
CONDITIONAL: The PRC imposes secret requirements that the funding it provides cannot be spent in states with diplomatic relations with Taiwan, Emma Reilly said China has been bribing UN officials to obtain “special benefits” and to block funding from countries that have diplomatic ties with Taiwan, a former UN employee told the British House of Commons on Tuesday. At a House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee hearing into “international relations within the multilateral system,” former Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) employee Emma Reilly said in a written statement that “Beijing paid bribes to the two successive Presidents of the [UN] General Assembly” during the two-year negotiation of the Sustainable Development Goals. Another way China exercises influence within the UN Secretariat is
Taiwan’s first drag queen to compete on the internationally acclaimed RuPaul’s Drag Race, Nymphia Wind (妮妃雅), was on Friday crowned the “Next Drag Superstar.” Dressed in a sparkling banana dress, Nymphia Wind swept onto the stage for the final, and stole the show. “Taiwan this is for you,” she said right after show host RuPaul announced her as the winner. “To those who feel like they don’t belong, just remember to live fearlessly and to live their truth,” she said on stage. One of the frontrunners for the past 15 episodes, the 28-year-old breezed through to the final after weeks of showcasing her unique